Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34484047›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2021

Aesthetics and Psychological Effects of Fractal Based Design.

Kelly E Robles, Michelle Roberts, Catherine Viengkham, Julian H Smith, Conor Rowland, Saba Moslehi, Sabrina Stadlober, Anastasija Lesjak, Martin Lesjak, Richard P Taylor and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The Fractal Geometry of the Brain: AnOverview.Advances in neurobiology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kelly E RoblesIntegrative Perception Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, United States.
Michelle RobertsPerception and Aesthetics Lab, School of Psychology, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Catherine ViengkhamPerception and Aesthetics Lab, School of Psychology, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Julian H SmithMaterial Science Institute, Department of Physics, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, United States.
Conor RowlandMaterial Science Institute, Department of Physics, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, United States.
Saba MoslehiMaterial Science Institute, Department of Physics, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, United States.
Sabrina Stadlober13&9 Design, Graz, Austria.
Anastasija Lesjak13&9 Design, Graz, Austria.
Martin Lesjak13&9 Design, Graz, Austria.
Richard P TaylorMaterial Science Institute, Department of Physics, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, United States.
Branka SpeharPerception and Aesthetics Lab, School of Psychology, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Margaret E SerenoIntegrative Perception Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Highly prevalent in nature, fractal patterns possess self-similar components that repeat at varying size scales. The perceptual experience of human-made environments can be impacted with inclusion of these natural patterns. Previous work has demonstrated consistent trends in preference for and complexity estimates of fractal patterns. However, limited information has been gathered on the impact of other visual judgments. Here we examine the aesthetic and perceptual experience of fractal 'global-forest' designs already installed in humanmade spaces and demonstrate how fractal pattern components are associated with positive psychological experiences that can be utilized to promote occupant wellbeing. These designs are composite fractal patterns consisting of individual fractal 'tree-seeds' which combine to create a 'global fractal forest.' The local 'tree-seed' patterns, global configuration of tree-seed locations, and overall resulting 'global-forest' patterns have fractal qualities. These designs span multiple mediums yet are all intended to lower occupant stress without detracting from the function and overall design of the space. In this series of studies, we first establish divergent relationships between various visual attributes, with pattern complexity, preference, and engagement ratings increasing with fractal complexity compared to ratings of refreshment and relaxation which stay the same or decrease with complexity. Subsequently, we determine that the local constituent fractal ('tree-seed') patterns contribute to the perception of the overall fractal design, and address how to balance aesthetic and psychological effects (such as individual experiences of perceived engagement and relaxation) in fractal design installations. This set of studies demonstrates that fractal preference is driven by a balance between increased arousal (desire for engagement and complexity) and decreased tension (desire for relaxation or refreshment). Installations of these composite mid-high complexity 'global-forest' patterns consisting of 'tree-seed' components balance these contrasting needs, and can serve as a practical implementation of biophilic patterns in human-made environments to promote occupant wellbeing.

Indexed as

aestheticscomposite fractalsfractal designfractal dimensionpreference

Identifiers

PMID34484047
PMCPMC8416160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.