Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34483999›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2021

Identification of Major Psychiatric Disorders From Resting-State Electroencephalography Using a Machine Learning Approach.

Su Mi Park, Boram Jeong, Da Young Oh, Chi-Hyun Choi, Hee Yeon Jung, Jun-Young Lee, Donghwan Lee, Jung-Seok Choi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Revisiting the role of computational neuroimaging in the era of integrative neuroscience.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Su Mi ParkDepartment of Psychiatry, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Boram JeongDepartment of Statistics, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea.
Da Young OhDepartment of Psychiatry, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Chi-Hyun ChoiDepartment of Psychiatry, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Hee Yeon JungDepartment of Psychiatry, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Jun-Young LeeDepartment of Psychiatry, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Donghwan LeeDepartment of Statistics, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea.
Jung-Seok ChoiDepartment of Psychiatry, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Seoul National University · KRSNUH SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center · KREwha Womans University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) classifier to detect and compare major psychiatric disorders using electroencephalography (EEG). We retrospectively collected data from medical records, intelligence quotient (IQ) scores from psychological assessments, and quantitative EEG (QEEG) at resting-state assessments from 945 subjects [850 patients with major psychiatric disorders (six large-categorical and nine specific disorders) and 95 healthy controls (HCs)]. A combination of QEEG parameters including power spectrum density (PSD) and functional connectivity (FC) at frequency bands was used to establish models for the binary classification between patients with each disorder and HCs. The support vector machine, random forest, and elastic net ML methods were applied, and prediction performances were compared. The elastic net model with IQ adjustment showed the highest accuracy. The best feature combinations and classification accuracies for discrimination between patients and HCs with adjusted IQ were as follows: schizophrenia = alpha PSD, 93.83%; trauma and stress-related disorders = beta FC, 91.21%; anxiety disorders = whole band PSD, 91.03%; mood disorders = theta FC, 89.26%; addictive disorders = theta PSD, 85.66%; and obsessive-compulsive disorder = gamma FC, 74.52%. Our findings suggest that ML in EEG may predict major psychiatric disorders and provide an objective index of psychiatric disorders.

Indexed as

classificationelectroencephalographyfunctional connectivitymachine learningpower spectrum densitypsychiatric disorderresting-state brain function

Identifiers

PMID34483999
PMCPMC8416434
OpenAlexW3196142795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.