Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34483979›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2021

"I Didn't See It as a Problem, I Thought It Was Going to Be Taken Away": Narratives From Family Members of Users in Rehab.

Ariagor Manuel Almanza-Avendaño, Martha Romero Mendoza, Anel Hortensia Gomez-San Luis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ariagor Manuel Almanza-AvendañoFacultad de Ciencias Humanas, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Mexicali, Mexico.
Martha Romero MendozaDirección de Investigaciones Epidemiológicas y Psicosociales, Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría, Ciudad de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Anel Hortensia Gomez-San LuisFacultad de Ciencias Humanas, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Mexicali, Mexico.
Universidad Autónoma de Baja California · MXInstituto Nacional de Psiquiatría · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are multiple discourses on addictions that influence the way in which relatives interpret the substance use of a family member. The purpose of this study is to understand the influence of these discourses on the construction of use as a problem by relatives of people in recovery. Narratives were obtained on the path of the illness to identify the phases in the construction of use as a problem and the influence of the discourses on each phase. The process has four successive phases: normalization, impasse, exasperation, and adoption of the treatment ideology. This process goes from the legitimization of use to its moral interpretation and subsequently to the transition to medical discourse. It is concluded that it is important to reduce the influence of the moral discourse in order to facilitate timely detection and early care, as well as to design interventions focused on the reconstruction of use as a problem.

Indexed as

discoursefamilyrecoverysocial constructionsubstance use

Identifiers

PMID34483979
PMCPMC8416069
OpenAlexW3195702467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.