Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34483847›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neural circuits2021

Modeling Nonlinear Dendritic Processing of Facilitation in a Dragonfly Target-Tracking Neuron.

Bo M B Bekkouche, Patrick A Shoemaker, Joseph M Fabian, Elisa Rigosi, Steven D Wiederman, David C O'Carroll

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neural circuits, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bo M B BekkoucheDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Patrick A ShoemakerComputational Science Research Center, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, United States.
Joseph M FabianAdelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Elisa RigosiDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Steven D WiedermanAdelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
David C O'CarrollDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dragonflies are highly skilled and successful aerial predators that are even capable of selectively attending to one target within a swarm. Detection and tracking of prey is likely to be driven by small target motion detector (STMD) neurons identified from several insect groups. Prior work has shown that dragonfly STMD responses are facilitated by targets moving on a continuous path, enhancing the response gain at the present and predicted future location of targets. In this study, we combined detailed morphological data with computational modeling to test whether a combination of dendritic morphology and nonlinear properties of NMDA receptors could explain these observations. We developed a hybrid computational model of neurons within the dragonfly optic lobe, which integrates numerical and morphological components. The model was able to generate potent facilitation for targets moving on continuous trajectories, including a localized spotlight of maximal sensitivity close to the last seen target location, as also measured during

Indexed as

OdonataAnimalsComputer SimulationInsectaNeuronsBSTMD1dragonflyfacilitationinsect brainlobulaNMDAsmall target motion detectorSTMD

Identifiers

PMID34483847
PMCPMC8415787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.