Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34483704›Full record

ArticleEducation and information technologies2022

Mobile device use among preschool-aged children in Greece.

Stamatios Papadakis, Foteini Alexandraki, Nikolaos Zaranis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Education and information technologies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Prevalence and description of digital device use among preschool children: A cross-sectional study in Kota Setar District, Kedah.Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Defining Digital Competence for Older Preschool Children.Psychology in Russia : state of the art · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stamatios PapadakisDepartment of Preschool Education, School of Education, University of Crete, Rethymnon, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-3184-1147
Foteini AlexandrakiDepartment of Preschool Education, School of Education, University of Crete, Rethymnon, Greece.
Nikolaos ZaranisDepartment of Preschool Education, School of Education, University of Crete, Rethymnon, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last decade, interactive touchscreen devices have become ubiquitous in young children, and toddlers first experience touchscreen technology before two. Although parents have a vital role in developing the home environment as a stimulus for development, they also have conflicting views on the appropriateness of using apps to deliver educational content for assorted reasons. The purpose of the study was to reveal various aspects of children's smart mobile use at home, such as the frequency of mobile device usage, preferred app types, and parent beliefs and strategies. Three hundred twenty-five parents of kindergarten children took part in this study. The present study revealed that parents seek to support their children's learning at home via mobile devices. Furthermore, parents lack knowledge about app developmentally appropriateness and need further guidance. We expect the findings to serve as a reference for researchers to better information for parents and create apps with real educational value for children.

Indexed as

AppsParentsPreschool childrenSmart mobile devices

Identifiers

PMID34483704
PMCPMC8406380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.