Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34483567›Full record

ReviewJournal of laboratory physicians2021

The Convalescent Plasma Craze! Where Does India Stand?

Arcot J Priyadarsini, Kumar Karan, Subramanian Arulselvi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of laboratory physicians, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 62% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Arcot J PriyadarsiniDepartment of Transfusion Medicine, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
Kumar KaranDepartment of Transfusion Medicine, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
Subramanian ArulselviDepartment of Laboratory Medicine & Blood Bank, Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma Centre, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7797-6683
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Raipur · INLok Nayak Jai Prakash Narayan Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

India becomes the country with second highest number of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases (59,03,932) as of September 2020. As the world debates various treatment options, the current pandemic has led to the resurgence of an ancient technique, namely convalescent plasma therapy. Although it has been in use from the late 19th century, it is an uncharted territory for most developing nations. In this article, we have discussed the pros and cons of convalescent plasma transfusion in COVID-19 patients. Articles discussed in this review have been obtained from search engines, namely PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. We have also expressed our viewpoint on the feasibility and logistical challenges of convalescent plasma use in India.

Indexed as

challengesconvalescent plasmaCOVID-19India

Identifiers

PMID34483567
PMCPMC8409110
OpenAlexW3173264352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.