ArticleIndustrial psychiatry journal
Critical appraisal of journal article by psychiatry PG residents using a new module: Impact analysis.
Article in Industrial psychiatry journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Global Prevalence of Severe Neonatal Jaundice among Hospital Admissions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA gap exists from evidence-based medicine (EBM) to clinical practice and there is a felt need to bridge this. Critical appraisal of scientific articles during Journal club by postgraduate (PG) residents will help them to understand and apply the scientific evidence into best clinical practice. Hence, a new module of critical appraisal of journal articles was used for Psychiatry Residents in a Medical College and its impact was assessed. MATERIALS AND
methodsNine psychiatry PG residents from three academic batches participated in the study after informed consent and Institutional ethical committee clearance. They were trained in the Colorado Psychiatry EBM Examination Test module. Subsequently, three consecutive journal article presentations of them were assessed under seven Subtests of the module.
resultsThere was gradual increase in the assessment scores of all PG residents with each journal article presentation. They also expressed satisfaction of the assessment method and felt confident of applying the principles of critical appraisal in their clinical practice in future.
conclusionThis study evaluated the impact of a new module of critical appraisal of journal article by psychiatry PG residents. It was found to be acceptable by residents and improved their competency to apply literature-based EBM into their clinical practice. It is recommended for further multicentric evaluation on a larger sample.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.