ArticleMedical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina)2021
Comparison of Flap Characteristics Created with Two Different Methods in Laser in Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK).
Article in Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Analysis of the Effectiveness of SMILE, FS-LASIK, and SBK in Myopic Patients and the Impact in UCVA and Tear Film Stability.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe creation of corneal flap is considered to be the most critical part of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery. Currently, flaps can be created with mechanical micorkeratomes or femtosecond lasers.
objectiveTo analyze and compare flap characteristics created with two different methods for flap creation in Laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).
methodsThis was a retrospective study. The thickness and morphology of the flap were compared between the two mechanical microkeratomes (group I - Moria M2, group II - Moria SBK One Use Plus) and femtosecond laser (group III - Ziemer Femto LDV). Central flap thickness was measured intraoperatively, while the flap profile was measured with anterior optical coherence tomography at two axes (90° and 180°) and 5 measuring points on the first day, the first week, and one month after the surgery.
resultsCentral flap thickness was 110.91±15.79 micrometers (µm) (80-164 µm) in group I, 98.08±13.33 µm (65-136 µm) in group II and 103.52±13.89 µm (66-138 µm) in group III. Anterior optical coherence tomography revealed a meniscus-shaped flap in all three groups at both axes (90° and 180°). The least variability in flap thickness was observed in group III (±6 µm).
conclusionAll three methods of flap creation provide good shape and thickness reproducibility. Ziemer Femto LDV femtosecond laser had the least variable flap thickness in a single flap. Mechanical microkeratomes had slightly lower performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.