Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34483372›Full record

ArticlePattern recognition2022

AI-Based human audio processing for COVID-19: A comprehensive overview.

Gauri Deshpande, Anton Batliner, Björn W Schuller

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pattern recognition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Multimodal Technologies for Remote Assessment of Neurological and Mental Health.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. The Voice of the Body: Why AI Should Listen to It and an Archive.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Speech as a Biomarker for COVID-19 Detection Using Machine Learning.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Gauri DeshpandeChair of Embedded Intelligence for Health Care and Wellbeing, University of Augsburg, Germany.
Anton BatlinerChair of Embedded Intelligence for Health Care and Wellbeing, University of Augsburg, Germany.
Björn W SchullerChair of Embedded Intelligence for Health Care and Wellbeing, University of Augsburg, Germany.
University of Augsburg · DEImperial College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic impelled several research efforts, from collecting COVID-19 patients' data to screening them for virus detection. Some COVID-19 symptoms are related to the functioning of the respiratory system that influences speech production; this suggests research on identifying markers of COVID-19 in speech and other human generated audio signals. In this article, we give an overview of research on human audio signals using 'Artificial Intelligence' techniques to screen, diagnose, monitor, and spread the awareness about COVID-19. This overview will be useful for developing automated systems that can help in the context of COVID-19, using non-obtrusive and easy to use bio-signals conveyed in human non-speech and speech audio productions.

Indexed as

Audio processingComputational paralinguisticsCOVID-19Digital health

Identifiers

PMID34483372
PMCPMC8404390
OpenAlexW3196324719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.