Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34483365›Full record

ArticleJournal of physics D: Applied physics2020

Optimizing the performance of multiline-scanning confocal microscopy.

Chun Hung Weng, Jialei Tang, Kyu Young Han

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of physics D: Applied physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chun Hung WengCREOL, The College of Optics and Photonics, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Jialei TangCREOL, The College of Optics and Photonics, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Kyu Young HanCREOL, The College of Optics and Photonics, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.

Funding

Multicolor two-photon excitation STED microscopy with multichannel compact semiconductor laserR21GM131163 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA · PI DELFYETT, PETER, HAN, KYU YOUNG · 2019 to 2020
$382k
NIGMS NIH HHS R21 GM131163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Line-scanning confocal microscopy provides high imaging speed and moderate optical sectioning strength, which makes it a useful tool for imaging various biospecimens ranging from living cells to fixed tissues. Conventional line-scanning systems have only used a single excitation line and slit, and thus have not fully exploited benefits of parallelization. Here we investigate the optical performance of multi-line scanning confocal microscopy (mLS) by employing a digital micro-mirror that provides programmable patterns of the illumination beam and the detection slit. Through experimental results and optical simulations, we assess the depth discrimination of mLS under different optical parameters and compare it with multi-point systems such as scanning disk confocal microscopy (SDCM). Under the same illumination duty cycle, we find that mLS has better optical sectioning than SDCM at a high degree of parallelization. The optimized mLS provides a low photobleaching rate and video-rate imaging while its optical sectioning is similar to single line-scanning confocal microscopy.

Indexed as

confocal microscopyDMDfluorescence imagingillumination duty cyclemultiline illuminationoptical sectioningphotobleaching

Identifiers

PMID34483365
PMCPMC8412417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.