Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34483094›Full record

Trial reportEuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology2022

Long-term clinical outcomes of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds versus everolimus-eluting stents: final five-year results of the AIDA randomised clinical trial.

Laura S M Kerkmeijer, Mick P L Renkens, Ruben Y G Tijssen, Sjoerd H Hofma, Rene J van der Schaaf, E Karin Arkenbout, Auke P J D Weevers, Hector M Garcia-Garcia, Robin Kraak, Jan J Piek and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01858077 (Amsterdam Investigator-initiateD Absorb Strategy All-comers Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01858077 naunknown statusnot on this map

Amsterdam Investigator-initiateD Absorb Strategy All-comers Trial (AIDA Trial): A Clinical Evaluation Comparing the Efficacy and Performance of ABSORB™ Everolimus Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Strategy Versus the XIENCE Family (XIENCE PRIME™ or XIENCE Xpedition™) Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent Strategy in the Treatment of Coronary Lesions in Consecutive All-comers.

TypeinterventionalSponsorAcademisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)Ran2013 to 2020Enrolled1,845ConditionsCoronary Artery Disease, Myocardial InfarctionArmsABSORB BVS™, XIENCE™
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Ready for a Rematch?Current cardiology reports · 2026
    Review
  5. Early "Scars" and Long-Term Promise of Bioresorbable Scaffolds: A Decade of Evidence From SCAAR.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Impact of lesion preparation and stent optimisation on lesion-oriented events in PCI with drug-eluting stents: 5-year results from the AIDA trial.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Bioabsorbable coronary stents - should they be buried?EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Laura S M KerkmeijerAmsterdam UMC, Heart Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Mick P L RenkensAmsterdam UMC, Heart Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Ruben Y G TijssenAmsterdam UMC, Heart Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Sjoerd H HofmaDepartment of Cardiology, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands.
Rene J van der SchaafDepartment of Cardiology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
E Karin ArkenboutDepartment of Cardiology, Tergooi Hospital, Blaricum, the Netherlands.
Auke P J D WeeversDepartment of Cardiology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
Hector M Garcia-GarciaCardiology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Robin KraakDepartment of Cardiology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Jan J PiekAmsterdam UMC, Heart Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Jan G P TijssenAmsterdam UMC, Heart Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Jose P S HenriquesAmsterdam UMC, Heart Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Robbert J de WinterAmsterdam UMC, Heart Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Joanna J WykrzykowskaUMC Groningen, Thorax Center, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
University of Amsterdam · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLOLVG · NLAlbert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis · NLMedisch Centrum Leeuwarden · NLTergooi · NLUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAbsorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS)-related events have been reported between 1 and 3 years - the period of active scaffold bioresorption. Data on the performance of the Absorb BVS in daily clinical practice beyond this time point are scarce.

aimsThis report aimed to provide the final five-year clinical follow-up of the Absorb BVS in comparison with the XIENCE everolimus-eluting stent (EES). In addition, we evaluated the effect of prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) administration on events in the scaffold group.

methodsAIDA was a multicentre, investigator-initiated, non-inferiority trial, in which 1,845 unselected patients with coronary artery disease were randomly assigned to either the Absorb BVS (n=924) or the XIENCE EES (n=921). Target vessel failure (TVF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction or target vessel revascularisation, was the primary endpoint. Scaffold thrombosis cases were matched with controls and tested for the effect of prolonged DAPT.

resultsUp to five-year follow-up, there was no difference in TVF between the Absorb BVS (17.7%) and the XIENCE EES (16.1%) (hazard ratio [HR] 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.90-1.41; p=0.302). Definite or probable device thrombosis (DT) occurred in 43 patients (4.8%) in the scaffold group compared to 13 patients (1.5%) in the stent group (HR 3.32, 95% CI: 1.78-6.17; p<0.001). DT between 3 and 4 years occurred six times in the Absorb arm versus three times in the XIENCE arm. Between 4 and 5 years, the incidence was three versus two, respectively. Of those three DT in the scaffold group, two occurred in XIENCE EES-treated lesions. The odds ratio of scaffold thrombosis in patients on DAPT compared to off DAPT throughout five-year follow-up was 0.36 (95% CI: 0.15-0.86).

conclusionsThe excess risk of the Absorb BVS on late adverse events, in particular device thrombosis, in routine PCI continues up to 4 years and seems to plateau afterwards. Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01858077.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseDrug-Eluting StentsPercutaneous Coronary InterventionAbsorbable ImplantsEverolimusHumansProsthesis DesignStentsTreatment OutcomeEverolimus

Identifiers

PMID34483094
PMCPMC9743247
OpenAlexW3196526239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.