Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34483058›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhA

A coordinated strategy to develop and distribute infographics addressing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and misinformation.

Shannon M Rotolo, Shikha Jain, Serena Dhaon, Jack K Dokhanchi, Elzbieta Kalata, Tejal Shah, Lisa J Mordell, Marla L Clayman, Alexandra Kenefake, Laura J Zimmermann and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Shannon M Rotolo
Shikha Jain
Serena Dhaon
Jack K Dokhanchi
Elzbieta Kalata
Tejal Shah
Lisa J Mordell
Marla L Clayman
Alexandra Kenefake
Laura J Zimmermann
Eve Bloomgarden
Vineet M Arora

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVisual communication strategies are becoming increasingly prevalent for conveying information to health professionals as well as to the general public. The potential of social media for rapid knowledge dissemination using infographics was recognized early in the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic by health professionals.

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to describe a coalition of health professionals' approach to developing infographics about COVID-19 vaccines and the reach and engagement of those infographics when shared through social media.

methodsInfographics were created by a core team within the coalition following a stepwise approach. Each underwent a multistep review process, readability evaluation, and translation into Spanish. Infographics were then shared through multiple social media platforms. They were grouped into 1 of 3 categories for this analysis: COVID-19 vaccine series, myth debunkers, or other.

resultsAll infographics had greater outreach, impressions, and engagement on Twitter than they did on other platforms. When comparing the 3 groups, no 1 infographic type was consistently performing higher than the others.

conclusionEach infographic reached thousands to tens of thousands of people. We do not know whether those who viewed these infographics changed their perspective on vaccination, so we are unable to draw a conclusion about their impact on vaccine hesitancy based on this study alone.

Indexed as

COVID-19Social MediaCommunicationCOVID-19 VaccinesData VisualizationHumansSARS-CoV-2VaccinationVaccination HesitancyCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID34483058
PMCPMC8380065
OpenAlexW3195743575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.