Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34482660›Full record

ArticleNursing open2021

The level of competence of graduating nursing students in 10 European countries-Comparison between countries.

Satu Kajander-Unkuri, Sanna Koskinen, Anna Brugnolli, MªAngeles Cerezuela Torre, Imane Elonen, Viktorija Kiele, Daniela Lehwaldt, Eliisa Löyttyniemi, Jana Nemcová, Célia Simão de Oliveira and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Polish Adaptation of the Nurse Professional Competence Scale.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cultural Competence of European Nursing Faculty. An International Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Satu Kajander-UnkuriDepartment of Nursing science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-2668-5856
Sanna KoskinenDepartment of Nursing science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-5886-3162
Anna BrugnolliDepartment of Public Health, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari, Trento, Italy.
MªAngeles Cerezuela TorreFaculty of Nursing, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Imane ElonenDepartment of Nursing science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Viktorija KieleDepartment of Nursing science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Daniela LehwaldtSchool of Nursing, Psychotherapy and community Health, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.
Eliisa LöyttyniemiDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Jana NemcováDepartment of nursing, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0003-4972-2621
Célia Simão de OliveiraDepartment of Fundamentals of Nursing, Lisbon School of Nursing, Lisbon, Portugal.
Alvisa PaleseDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3508-844X
Marília RuaSchool of Health Sciences, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.
Leena SalminenDepartment of Nursing science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-9730-5331
Lenka ŠatekováDepartment of Nursing, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Juliane StubnerInstitute for Health and Nursing Science, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.
Herdís SveinsdóttirFaculty of Nursing, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland.ORCID 0000-0002-1766-3543
Laura Visiers-JiménezFundación San Juan de Dios, Centro de CC de la Salud San Rafael, Universidad Antonio de Nebrija, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7120-1422
Helena Leino-KilpiDepartment of Nursing science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-2477-971X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo analyse graduating nursing students' self-assessed competence level in Europe at graduation, at the beginning of nursing career.

designAn international cross-sectional evaluative design.

methodsData were collected in February 2018-July 2019 from graduating nursing students in 10 European countries. Competence was assessed with a validated instrument, the Nurse Competence Scale (NCS). The sample comprised 3,490 students (response rate 45%), and data were analysed statistically.

resultsIn all countries, graduating nursing students assessed their competence as good (range 50.0-69.1; VAS 0-100), albeit with statistically significant differences between countries. The assessments were highest in Iceland and lowest in Lithuania. Older students, those with working experience in health care, satisfied with their current degree programme, with excellent or good study achievements, graduating to 1st study choice and having a nursing career plan for future assessed their competence higher.

Indexed as

Students, NursingCross-Sectional StudiesEuropeHumansIcelandLithuaniacompetenceEuropeevaluationgraduating nursing studentnurse competence scalenursing education

Identifiers

PMID34482660
PMCPMC8046055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.