ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2022
Reliability evaluation of groundwater quality index using data-driven models.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.
- Seasonal water quality index prediction in Guilin karst water system: an explainable machine learning approach.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Groundwater quality index prediction and aquifer failure risk analysis using metaheuristic-tuned artificial neural networks.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Gauging road safety advances using a hybrid EWM-PROMETHEE II-DBSCAN model with machine learning.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A trustworthy evaluation of the groundwater quality situations for different usages (i.e., drinking, industry, and agriculture) can definitely improve the management of groundwater resources for quality and quantity control, particularly in the arid and semi-arid districts. In the present investigation, GQI values and their typical categories have been yielded by the World Health Organization (WHO) instruction for the Rafsanjan Plain, the central part of Iran, during a 15-year period beginning in 2002. In this study, four robust Data-Driven Techniques (DDTs) based on the evolutionary algorithms and classification concepts have been applied to present formulations for the prediction of groundwater quality index (GQI) values in the case study of Rafsanjan Plain. In this way, monthly groundwater quality parameters (i.e., electrical conductivity, total hardness, total dissolved solid, pH, chloride, bicarbonate, sulfate, phosphate, calcium, magnesium, potassium, and sodium) were taken from 1349 observations. Performance of DDTs indicated that the Evolutionary Polynomial Regression (EPR) demonstrated the most accurate predictions of GQI than a model tree (MT), gene-expression programming (GEP), and Multivariate Adaptive Regression Spline (MARS). Moreover, to investigate all probable uncertainty in the values of groundwater quality parameters for the Rafsanjan Plain, a reliability-based probabilistic model was designed to assess the values of GQI. Hence, the Monte-Carlo scenario sampling technique has been quantified to evaluate the limit state function from DDTs. Moreover, there is a high probability (almost 100%) for the whole region to pass the "Excellent" quality, but it reduces to almost 50% over the "Good" and leads to almost 0% for the "Poor" quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.