Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34482444›Full record

ReviewEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2022

Possibilities of coblation in otorhinolaryngology: analytical review.

Valerij M Svistushkin, Svetlana V Starostina, Alexey V Toldanov

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Valerij M SvistushkinDepartment of Ear, Throat and Nose Diseases of N.V. Sklifosovsky Clinical Medicine Institute of the Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), 6/1, Bol'shayaPirogovskaya St., 119021, Moscow, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7414-1293
Svetlana V StarostinaDepartment of Ear, Throat and Nose Diseases of N.V. Sklifosovsky Clinical Medicine Institute of the Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), 6/1, Bol'shayaPirogovskaya St., 119021, Moscow, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7165-1308
Alexey V ToldanovDepartment of Ear, Throat and Nose Diseases of N.V. Sklifosovsky Clinical Medicine Institute of the Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), 6/1, Bol'shayaPirogovskaya St., 119021, Moscow, Russia. atoldanov@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8694-5720
Sechenov University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveReview literature data on the coblation method in otorhinolaryngology. MATERIALS AND

methodsAll materials from our study are published in peer-reviewed journals. The review is PubMed generated. In our clinic, 20 patients with bilateral paralytic laryngeal stenosis underwent cold-plasma posterior arytenoidcordotomy with Coblator II.

resultsThe analysis of the high-energy techniques currently applied in otorhinolaryngology shows the benefits of coblation due to the effect of lower temperatures on tissues. Patients subjectively reported improved breathing on day 10 with a closed coblation tracheostoma; after 3-6 months everyone underwent successful decannulation with plastic surgery of the cutaneous-tracheal fistula. Lately, the operated vocal fold was in the abduction position and the lumen of the glottis in the posterior third was 7-8 mm. Compensation of vocal function in the long-term postoperative period was achieved by patients due to long-term orthophonic training and the development of a vestibuloscapular phonation mechanism.

conclusionThe advantages of coblation are mainly minimal trauma to the surrounding tissues, convenient resection, the ability to perform complete hemostasis at one time, and easier postoperative period for the patient.

Indexed as

OtolaryngologyVocal Cord ParalysisGlottisHumansPhonationVocal CordsAdenotonsillectomyBilateral laryngeal paralysisCoblationPosterior arytenoidcordotomyRhinologySnoring

Identifiers

PMID34482444
OpenAlexW3198502555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.