Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34482156›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in biotechnology2022

Cellobiose dehydrogenase in biofuel cells.

Stefan Scheiblbrandner, Florian Csarman, Roland Ludwig

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Interface engineering of cellobiose dehydrogenase improves interdomain electron transfer.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stefan ScheiblbrandnerBiocatalysis and Biosensing Laboratory, Department of Food Science and Technology, BOKU-University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Muthgasse 11, Vienna, 1190, Austria.
Florian CsarmanBiocatalysis and Biosensing Laboratory, Department of Food Science and Technology, BOKU-University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Muthgasse 11, Vienna, 1190, Austria.
Roland LudwigBiocatalysis and Biosensing Laboratory, Department of Food Science and Technology, BOKU-University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Muthgasse 11, Vienna, 1190, Austria. Electronic address: roland.ludwig@boku.ac.at.

Funding

European Research Council 726396
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enzymatic biofuel cells utilize oxidoreductases as highly specific and highly active electrocatalysts to convert a fuel and an oxidant even in complex biological matrices like hydrolysates or physiological fluids into electric energy. The hemoflavoenzyme cellobiose dehydrogenase is investigated as a versatile bioelectrocatalyst for the anode reaction of biofuel cells, because it is robust, converts a range of different carbohydrates, and can transfer electrons to the anode by direct electron transfer or via redox mediators. The versatility of cellobiose dehydrogenase has led to the development of various electrode modifications to create biofuel cells and biosupercapacitors that are capable to power small electronic devices like biosensors and connect them wireless to a receiver.

Indexed as

Bioelectric Energy SourcesCarbohydrate DehydrogenasesElectrodesElectron TransportCarbohydrate Dehydrogenasescellobiose-quinone oxidoreductase

Identifiers

PMID34482156
PMCPMC7613715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.