Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34481702›Full record

Trial reportVaccine2021

Assessing the immunogenicity of three different inactivated polio vaccine schedules for use after oral polio vaccine cessation, an open label, phase IV, randomized controlled trial.

Khalequ Zaman, Stephanie D Kovacs, Kristin Vanderende, Asma Aziz, Mohammed Yunus, Sara Khan, Cynthia J Snider, Qian An, Concepcion F Estivariz, M Steven Oberste and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Vaccine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Khalequ ZamanInternational Centre for Diarrheal Disease, Bangladesh (icddr,b), 68, Shaheed Tajuddin Ahmed Sarani, Mohakhali, Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh.
Stephanie D KovacsCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA. Electronic address: uxv4@cdc.gov.
Kristin VanderendeCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
Asma AzizInternational Centre for Diarrheal Disease, Bangladesh (icddr,b), 68, Shaheed Tajuddin Ahmed Sarani, Mohakhali, Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh.
Mohammed YunusInternational Centre for Diarrheal Disease, Bangladesh (icddr,b), 68, Shaheed Tajuddin Ahmed Sarani, Mohakhali, Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh.
Sara KhanCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
Cynthia J SniderCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
Qian AnCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
Concepcion F EstivarizCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
M Steven ObersteCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
Mark A PallanschCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
Abhijeet AnandCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research · BD

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAfter global oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) cessation, the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization (SAGE) currently recommends a two-dose schedule of inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) beginning ≥14-weeks of age to achieve at least 90% immune response. We aimed to compare the immunogenicity of three different two-dose IPV schedules started before or at 14-weeks of age.

methodsWe conducted a randomized, controlled, open-label, inequality trial at two sites in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Healthy infants at 6-weeks of age were randomized into one of five arms to receive two-dose IPV schedules at different ages with and without OPV. The three IPV-only arms are presented: Arm C received IPV at 14-weeks and 9-months; Arm D received IPV at 6-weeks and 9-months; and Arm E received IPV at 6 and 14-weeks. The primary outcome was immune response defined as seroconversion from seronegative (<1:8) to seropositive (≥1:8) after vaccination, or a four-fold rise in antibody titers and median reciprocal antibody titers to all three poliovirus types measured at 10-months of age.

findingsOf the 987 children randomized to Arms C, D, and E, 936 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. At 10-months, participants in Arm C (IPV at 14-weeks and 9-months) had ≥99% cumulative immune response to all three poliovirus types which was significantly higher than the 77-81% observed in Arm E (IPV at 6 and 14-weeks). Participants in Arm D (IPV at 6-weeks and 9-months) had cumulative immune responses of 98-99% which was significantly higher than that of Arm E (p value < 0.0001) but not different from Arm C.

interpretationResults support current SAGE recommendations for IPV following OPV cessation and provide evidence that the schedule of two full IPV doses could begin as early as 6-weeks.

Indexed as

PoliomyelitisPoliovirus Vaccine, OralAntibodies, ViralBangladeshChildHumansInfantPoliovirus Vaccine, InactivatedAntibodies, ViralPoliovirus Vaccine, InactivatedPoliovirus Vaccine, OralImmunization scheduleInactivated poliovirus vaccinePoliovirus

Identifiers

PMID34481702
PMCPMC9059229
OpenAlexW3197996871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.