ArticleLasers in surgery and medicine2022
Toward optoacoustic sciatic nerve detection using an all-fiber interferometric-based sensor for endoscopic smart laser surgery.
Article in Lasers in surgery and medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Photoacoustic spectroscopy detection based on complementary interdigital cantilever enhanced Fabry-Perot acoustic sensor.Photoacoustics · 2025Article
- Global trends of laser bone ablation: bibliometric analysis of publications from 1979 to 2023.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Review
- Toward optoacoustic sciatic nerve detection using an all-fiber interferometric-based sensor for endoscopic smart laser surgery.Lasers in surgery and medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesLaser surgery requires efficient tissue classification to reduce the probability of undesirable or unwanted tissue damage. This study aimed to investigate acoustic shock waves (ASWs) as a means of classifying sciatic nerve tissue. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this study, we classified sciatic nerve tissue against other tissue types-hard bone, soft bone, fat, muscle, and skin extracted from two proximal and distal fresh porcine femurs-using the ASWs generated by a laser during ablation. A nanosecond frequency-doubled Nd:YAG laser at 532 nm was used to create 10 craters on each tissue type's surface. We used a fiber-coupled Fabry-Pérot sensor to measure the ASWs. The spectrum's amplitude from each ASW frequency band measured was used as input for principal component analysis (PCA). PCA was combined with an artificial neural network to classify the tissue types. A confusion matrix and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to calculate the accuracy of the testing-data-based scores from the sciatic nerve and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) with a 95% confidence-level interval.
resultsBased on the confusion matrix and ROC analysis of the model's tissue classification results (leave-one-out cross-validation), nerve tissue could be classified with an average accuracy rate and AUC result of 95.78 ± 1.3% and 99.58 ± 0.6%, respectively.
conclusionThis study demonstrates the potential of using ASWs for remote classification of nerve and other tissue types. The technique can serve as the basis of a feedback control system to detect and preserve sciatic nerves in endoscopic laser surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.