Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34481360›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in genetics & development2021

Break-induced replication mechanisms in yeast and mammals.

Xiaohua Wu, Anna Malkova

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in genetics & development, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mutations and structural variants arising during double-strand break repair.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Mechanisms and genomic implications of break-induced replication.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. ATM priming and end resection-coupled phosphorylation of MRE11 is important for fork protection and replication restart.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaohua WuDepartment of Molecular Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, United States. Electronic address: xiaohwu@scripps.edu.
Anna MalkovaDepartment of Biology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States. Electronic address: anna-malkova@uiowa.edu.
Scripps Research Institute · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

Study the mechanisms underlying common fragile site protectionR01CA187052 · NCI · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI WU, XIAOHUA · 2015 to 2025
$4.2M
Double strand break repair maelstrom: causes, mechanisms and genome destabilizing consequencesR35GM127006 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI Anna L Malkova · 2018 to 2026
$3.8M
The Role of Human RAD52 Protein in Genome StabilityR01CA232425 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Maria Spies · 2019 to 2026
$3.1M
Investigating DNA double-strand break repair mechanisms in mammalian cellsR35GM141868 · NIGMS · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI WU, XIAOHUA · 2021 to 2025
$2.5M
Study of Break-induced Replication in Mammalian CellsR01CA244912 · NCI · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI WU, XIAOHUA · 2020 to 2024
$2.5M
Identifying the link between the mode of telomere erosion and alternative telomere lengtheningR21ES030307 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI COMERON, JOSEP M, MALKOVA, ANNA L · 2019 to 2020
$408k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA187052NCI NIH HHS R01 CA232425NCI NIH HHS R01 CA244912NIEHS NIH HHS R21 ES030307NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM127006NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM141868
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Break-induced replication (BIR) is a pathway specialized in repair of double-strand DNA breaks with only one end capable of invading homologous template that can arise following replication collapse, telomere erosion or DNA cutting by site-specific endonucleases. For a long time, yeast remained the only model system to study BIR. Studies in yeast demonstrated that BIR represents an unusual mode of DNA synthesis that is driven by a migrating bubble and leads to conservative inheritance of newly synthesized DNA. This unusual type of DNA synthesis leads to high levels of mutations and chromosome rearrangements. Recently, multiple examples of BIR were uncovered in mammalian cells that allowed the comparison of BIR between organisms. It appeared initially that BIR in mammalian cells is predominantly independent of RAD51, and therefore different from BIR that is predominantly Rad51-dependent in yeast. However, a series of systematic studies utilizing site-specific DNA breaks for BIR initiation in mammalian reporters led to the discovery of highly efficient RAD51-dependent BIR, allowing side-by side comparison with BIR in yeast which is the focus of this review.

Indexed as

DNA RepairSaccharomyces cerevisiaeAnimalsDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA ReplicationMammals

Identifiers

PMID34481360
PMCPMC9109633
OpenAlexW3198522767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.