Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34480963›Full record

ReviewPharmacology & therapeutics2022

Cell plasticity, senescence, and quiescence in cancer stem cells: Biological and therapeutic implications.

Ritama Paul, Jay F Dorsey, Yi Fan

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacology & therapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed, 149 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ritama PaulDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Jay F DorseyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Yi FanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. Electronic address: fanyi@upenn.edu.
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Endothelial plasticity in glioma vascularization and therapy resistanceR01NS094533 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Yi Fan · 2015 to 2026
$4.3M
Dissecting the biology and consequence of circulating glioma cellsR01CA241501 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DORSEY, JAY FITZGERALD, FAN, YI · 2020 to 2024
$2.3M
Macrophage polarization in glioma microenvironmentR01NS106108 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI FAN, YI · 2018 to 2022
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA241501NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS094533NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS106108
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are a distinct population of cells within tumors with capabilities of self-renewal and tumorigenicity. CSCs play a pivotal role in cancer progression, metastasis, and relapse and tumor resistance to cytotoxic therapy. Emerging scientific evidence indicates that CSCs adopt several mechanisms, driven by cellular plasticity, senescence and quiescence, to maintain their self-renewal capability and to resist tumor microenvironmental stress and treatments. These pose major hindrances for CSC-targeting anti-cancer therapies: cell plasticity maintains stemness in CSCs and renders tumor cells to acquire stem-like phenotypes, contributing to tumor heterogeneity and CSC generation; cellular senescence induces genetic reprogramming and stemness activation, leading to CSC-mediated tumor progression and metastasis; cell quienscence facilitates CSC to overcome their intrinsic vulnerabilities and therapeutic stress, inducing tumor relapse and therapy resistance. These mechanisms are subjected to spatiotemporal regulation by hypoxia, CSC niche, and extracellular matrix in the tumor microenvironment. Here we integrate the recent advances and current knowledge to elucidate the mechanisms involved in the regulation of plasticity, senescence and quiescence of CSCs and the potential therapeutic implications for the future.

Indexed as

Cell PlasticityNeoplasmsCellular SenescenceHumansNeoplastic Stem CellsTumor MicroenvironmentCancer stem cellsPlasticityQuiescenceSenescenceTherapy resistanceTumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID34480963
PMCPMC8844041
OpenAlexW3198240634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.