Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34480798›Full record

ReviewPhysiologia plantarum2022

New approaches to improve crop tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses.

Miguel González Guzmán, Francesco Cellini, Vasileios Fotopoulos, Raffaella Balestrini, Vicent Arbona

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physiologia plantarum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Small non-coding RNAMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Analyses of Antioxidative Response in Tomato (Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Influence of TriploidPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Priming thermotolerance: unlocking heat resilience for climate-smart crops.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Miguel González GuzmánDepartament de Ciències Agràries i del Medi Natural, Universitat Jaume I, Castelló de la Plana, Spain.
Francesco CelliniThe OPTIMUS PRIME consortium, European Union Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area (PRIMA) Program.
Vasileios FotopoulosThe OPTIMUS PRIME consortium, European Union Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area (PRIMA) Program.
Raffaella BalestriniThe OPTIMUS PRIME consortium, European Union Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area (PRIMA) Program.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7958-7681
Vicent ArbonaDepartament de Ciències Agràries i del Medi Natural, Universitat Jaume I, Castelló de la Plana, Spain.

Funding

CNR project Green & Circular Economy FOE-2019 DBA.AD003.139Generalitat Valenciana/Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional IDIFEDER/2018/010Ramon y Cajal contract from Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad RYC-2016-19325Universitat Jaume I UJI-B2019-24
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the last years, a great effort has been dedicated at the development and employment of diverse approaches for achieving more stress-tolerant and climate-flexible crops and sustainable yield increases to meet the food and energy demands of the future. The ongoing climate change is in fact leading to more frequent extreme events with a negative impact on food production, such as increased temperatures, drought, and soil salinization as well as invasive arthropod pests and diseases. In this review, diverse "green strategies" (e.g., chemical priming, root-associated microorganisms), and advanced technologies (e.g., genome editing, high-throughput phenotyping) are described on the basis of the most recent research evidence. Particularly, attention has been focused on the potential use in a context of sustainable and climate-smart agriculture (the so called "next agriculture generation") to improve plant tolerance and resilience to abiotic and biotic stresses. In addition, the gap between the results obtained in controlled experiments and those from application of these technologies in real field conditions (lab to field step) is also discussed.

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalStress, PhysiologicalAgricultureClimate ChangeDroughts

Identifiers

PMID34480798
PMCPMC9290814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.