Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34480767›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2022

Contribution of blood to nuclear Overhauser effect at -1.6 ppm.

Jing Cui, Yu Zhao, Feng Wang, Daniel F Gochberg, Zhongliang Zu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jing CuiVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0902-8715
Yu ZhaoVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Feng WangVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8965-7708
Daniel F GochbergVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Zhongliang ZuVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7361-7480
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Proton Relaxation and Exchange Contrast in MRIR01EB024525 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI ZU, ZHONGLIANG · 2018 to 2021
$2.0M
CERT Imaging of CancerR01CA184693 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI GOCHBERG, DANIEL F · 2014 to 2018
$1.6M
Nuclear Overhauser enhancement (NOE) MR imaging of choline phospholipids and their metabolismR01EB029443 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI ZU, ZHONGLIANG · 2021 to 2024
$1.5M
Upgrade of a 9.4T MRI Animal ScannerS10OD025085 · OD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI GORE, JOHN C · 2020 to 2020
$600k
Validation of CEST MR Imaging of Creatine and Phosphocreatine in MuscleR21AR074261 · NIAMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI ZU, ZHONGLIANG · 2018 to 2019
$382k
Optimizing Glutamate Imaging using CEST MRI at 3T Clinical ScannersR03EB029078 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI ZU, ZHONGLIANG · 2020 to 2021
$170k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA184693NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR074261NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB024525NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB029443NIBIB NIH HHS R03 EB029078NIH HHS S10 OD025085
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA relayed nuclear Overhauser enhancement (rNOE) saturation transfer effect at around -1.6 ppm from water, termed NOE(-1.6), was previously reported in rat and human brain, and some publications suggest that it may be related to blood. Here, we studied whether the NOE(-1.6) arises from blood through in vivo and ex vivo experiments.

methodsTo evaluate the contribution from in vivo blood to NOE(-1.6), intravascular signals in rat brain were suppressed by two approaches: (1) signal acquisition with a diffusion-weighting of b = 400 s/mm

resultsThere are no significant variations in the fitted in vivo NOE(-1.6) signals when measured with or without diffusion-weighting, but significant signal decease does occur after injection of MION. The NOE(-1.6) signal from ex vivo blood is weaker than that from in vivo tissues.

conclusionConsidering the relatively small volume of blood in brain, the in vivo experiments with diffusion weighting and the ex vivo experiments both suggest that the NOE(-1.6) is not mainly from blood. The mechanism for the in vivo experiments with MION are less clear. MION not only suppresses MR signals from intravascular space, but changes the susceptibility in the perivascular space. This result suggests that although the NOE(-1.6) is not mainly from blood, it may be vasculature dependent.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingAlgorithmsAnimalsBrainRatsSensitivity and Specificitychemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST)NOE(−1.6)nuclear Overhauser enhencement (NOE)

Identifiers

PMID34480767
PMCPMC8616842
OpenAlexW3197383038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.