Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34480659›Full record

ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2022

Utilization of a National Registry to influence opioid prescribing behavior after hernia repair.

M Reinhorn, T Dews, J A Warren, Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative Opioid Task Force*

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Characterizing patterns of opioid prescribing after outpatient ventral hernia repair with mesh.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

M ReinhornBoston Hernia & Pilonidal Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, 201 Walnut St, Ste 100, Wellesley, MD, 02481, USA.
T DewsCleveland Clinic Pain Management, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic Euclid Hospital, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, USA.
J A WarrenDepartment of Surgery, Prisma Health Upstate, University of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville, 701 Grove Rd, ST 3, Greenville, SC, 29605, USA. Jeremy.warren@prismahealth.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0364-5483
Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative Opioid Task Force*

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDespite progress toward curtailing opioid prescribing, physicians are often slow to adopt new prescribing practices. Using the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC), we aimed to demonstrate the ability of a national, disease-specific, personalized registry to impact opioid prescribing.

methodsUsing a collaborative and iterative process, a module was developed to capture surgeon opioid prescribing, patient-reported consumption, and risk factors for opioid use. Study reported according to the Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE) 2.0 guidelines.

resultsSix months after implementation of the ACHQC opioid module, we assessed participation, prescribing and patient consumption patterns. For ventral hernia repair (VHR; n = 398), 23 surgeons reported prescribing > 20 pills (43%), 11-20 (40%), and < 10 (18%). In contrast, patients (n = 217) reported taking < 10 pills in 65% and only 20% reported taking > 15. For inguinal hernia repair (IHR; n = 443) 37 surgeons reported prescribing > 20 tablets (22%), 11-20 (32%), and < 10 (44%). Patients (n = 277) reported taking < 10 pills in 81% of cases, including 50% reporting zero, and only 13% taking > 15. We identified barriers to practice change and developed a strategy for education, provision of individualized data, and encouraging participation. Surgeon participation has since increased significantly (n = 65 for VHR; n = 53 for IHR), and analysis of the impact of this process is ongoing.

conclusionQuality improvement requires physician engagement, which can be facilitated by meaningful and actionable data. The specificity of the ACHQC and the ability to provide surgeons with individualized data is a model method to incite change in physician behavior and improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidHerniorrhaphyHumansPostoperative PainPractice Patterns, Physicians'RegistriesAnalgesics, OpioidAbdominal Core Health Quality CollaborativeACHQCOpioidOpioid reduction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.