Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34480644›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2022

The effect of changing apical foramen diameter on regenerative potential of mature teeth with necrotic pulp and apical periodontitis.

Hisham M Abada, Ahmed Abdel Rahman Hashem, Ashraf Mohamed Abu-Seida, Mohamed Mokhtar Nagy

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Expert consensus on regenerative endodontic procedures.International journal of oral science · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hisham M AbadaDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh, Egypt. hisham.dentist@gmail.com.
Ahmed Abdel Rahman HashemDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Ashraf Mohamed Abu-SeidaDepartment of Surgery, Anesthesiology and Radiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
Mohamed Mokhtar NagyDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Ain Shams University · EGCairo University · EGKafrelsheikh University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of the present study was to evaluate the regenerative potential of permanent necrotic mature teeth with different apical foramen diameters in comparison to conventional endodontic treatment.

methodsPulp necrosis and periapical pathosis were induced in premolars (144 roots) in six mongrel dogs. The infected teeth were divided into six groups; conventional root canal treatment (RCT) group prepared up to apical preparation sizes #F3 ProTaper file, regenerative endodontic therapy (RET) groups; groups RET-F3, RET-F4, and RET-F5 where regenerative endodontic procedures were applied after apical preparation up to sizes #F3, F4, and F5 ProTaper file, respectively, control groups; and positive (P) and negative (N) groups included infected and healthy teeth respectively. Each group (12 teeth with 24 roots each) was further subdivided into two subgroups (6 teeth with 12 roots each) according to the evaluation periods 1 and 3 months; each group was equally randomized in the upper and lower jaws during each evaluation period.

resultsThe inflammatory cell counts for the RCT group were statistically significantly higher than that of all RET groups at the first period and only significantly higher than RET-F5 at the second period. The enlargement of the apical foramen to #F5 showed no statistically significant difference with #F4 regarding the inflammatory cell count, tissue in-growth inside the root canal, and percentage of bone resorption. The tissue formed after RET was not true pulp tissue and is considered tissue repair with connective tissue, dilated blood vessels, and cementum-like structures. 

conclusionIncreasing the apical size diameter was associated with less inflammatory cell count, less percentage of bone resorption, more tissue ingrowth, and more percentage of new hard tissue formation inside root canal. The minimum apical diameter that should be enlarged for RET is 0.4 mm. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: RET could be used as an alternative procedure to RCT for the treatment of mature teeth with necrotic pulp and apical periodontitis.

Indexed as

Dental Pulp NecrosisPeriapical PeriodontitisAnimalsDental PulpDogsRoot Canal TherapyTooth ApexApical diametersApical periodontitisMature teethRegenerative endodontic

Identifiers

PMID34480644
OpenAlexW3196605057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.