Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34480629›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2022

Long-term experience with a collagen-elastin scaffold in combination with split-thickness skin grafts for the treatment of full-thickness soft tissue defects: improvements in outcome-a retrospective cohort study and case report.

Maximilian Lempert, Sascha Halvachizadeh, Clara Charlotte Salfelder, Valentin Neuhaus, Hans-Christoph Pape, Gerrolt Nico Jukema

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Long-term results of split-thickness skin grafting with and without additional dermal matrix in severe traumatic soft tissue defects of the lower limb.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maximilian LempertDepartment of Trauma, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistr. 100, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland. maximilian.lempert@usz.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6934-5726
Sascha HalvachizadehDepartment of Trauma, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistr. 100, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland.
Clara Charlotte SalfelderDepartment of Trauma, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistr. 100, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland.
Valentin NeuhausDepartment of Trauma, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistr. 100, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland.
Hans-Christoph PapeDepartment of Trauma, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistr. 100, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland.
Gerrolt Nico JukemaDepartment of Trauma, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistr. 100, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe management of severe soft tissue injuries to the extremities with full-thickness wounds poses a challenge to the patient and surgeon. Dermal substitutes are used increasingly in these defects. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the type of injury on the success rate of Matriderm® (MD)-augmented split-thickness skin grafting, as well as the role of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in preconditioning of the wounds, with a special focus on the reduction of the bioburden.

methodsIn this study, 45 wounds (44 affecting lower extremities (97.7%)), resulting from different types of injuries: soft tissue (ST), soft tissue complications from closed fracture (F), and open fracture (OF) in 43 patients (age 55.0 ± 18.2 years, 46.7% female), were treated with the simultaneous application of MD and split-thickness skin grafting. The study was designed as a retrospective cohort study from March 2013 to March 2020. Patients were stratified into three groups: ST, F, and OF. Outcome variables were defined as the recurrence of treated wound defects, which required revision surgery, and the reduction of bioburden in terms of reduction of number of different bacterial strains. For statistical analysis, Student's t-test, analysis of variance (ANOVA), Mann-Whitney U test, and Pearson's chi-squared test were used.

resultsThere was no significant difference in the rate of recurrence in the different groups (F: 0%; OF: 11.1%; ST: 9.5%). The duration of VAC therapy significantly differed between the groups (F: 10.8 days; OF: 22.7 days; ST: 12.6 days (p < 0.05)). A clinically significant reduction of bioburden was achieved with NPWT (bacterial shift (mean (SD), F: - 2.25 (1.89); OF: - 1.9 (1.37); ST: - 2.6 (2.2)).

conclusionMD-augmented split-thickness skin grafting is an appropriate treatment option for full-thickness wounds with take rates of about 90%. The complexity of an injury significantly impacts the duration of the soft tissue treatment but does not have an influence on the take rate. NPWT leads to a relevant reduction of bioburden and is therefore an important part in the preconditioning of full-thickness wounds.

Indexed as

Negative-Pressure Wound TherapySkin TransplantationAdultAgedCollagenElastinFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesWound HealingCollagenElastinBioburdenDermal substituteFull-thickness woundsMatriderm®Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT)Skin grafting

Identifiers

PMID34480629
PMCPMC8847203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.