ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2022
[
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of PET-based prognostic metrics in CAR-T treatment of DLBCL.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Prognostic Factors and Effect Modifiers in Patients With Relapse or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma After Two Lines of Therapy: A Systematic Literature and Expert Clinical Review.European journal of haematology · 2025Pooled it
- The prognostic utility ofFrontiers in immunology · 2024Pooled it
- Semiquantitative PET Parameters Refine Prognosis in CAR T-Treated Lymphoma After 1 and 3 Months: A Prospective Single-Center Study.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025Trial
- Colour maps for representation of quantitative metrics in radiology: meaningful or misleading?Insights into imaging · 2026Review
- Early PET response predicts the risk of relapse after 2L axi-cel in large B-cell lymphoma.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Baseline [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- A Critical Review of PET/CT Assessment After CAR-T Cell Therapy in Large B-Cell Lymphoma, Limitations of Current Criteria, Emerging Biomarkers, and a Framework for Standardised Evaluation.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- Imaging Immunotherapy.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2026Review
- Added prognostic value of baseline pre-infusionScientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Assessment of reducedAnnals of nuclear medicine · 2025Article
- Prognostic value of early post-treatmentCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025Article
- The predictive power of baseline metabolic and volumetric [European journal of radiology open · 2025Article
- [European journal of radiology open · 2025Article
- Liver-FDG-uptake augments early PET/CT prognostic value for CD19-targeted CAR-T cell therapy in diffuse large B cell lymphoma.EJNMMI research · 2025Article
- Article
- Long-Axial Field-of-View PET Imaging in Patients with Lymphoma: Challenges and Opportunities.PET clinics · 2024Review
- Biomarkers of outcome in patients undergoing CD19 CAR-T therapy for large B cell lymphoma.HemaSphere · 2024Review
- [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe introduction of CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) for treatment of relapsed/refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) gives hope to patients with otherwise dismal prognosis. Therapy outcomes, however, depend upon selection of patients and accurate early identification of non-responders. Patients treated with CAR-T usually undergo [
methodsA total of 138 PET-CT scans (30 TD, 42 TT, 44 M1, 22 M3) of 48 patients treated with CAR-T were included. SUVmax, TMTV, and TLG were calculated in all scans. Response was assessed using the Deauville scale and ΔSUVmax method. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint. Median follow-up was 12.8 (IQR 6.4-16.0) months from CAR-T infusion.
resultsIn a univariate analysis, TD-SUVmax > 17.1 and TT-SUVmax > 12.1 were associated with shorter OS (Pv < 0.05). In a multivariate analysis, three factors were significantly associated with shorter OS: TD-SUVmax > 17.1 (HR 10.3; Pv < 0.01), LDH > 450 U/l (HR 7.7; Pv < 0.01), and ECOG score > 1 (HR 5.5; Pv = 0.04). Data from TD and TT PET-CT scans were not predictive of toxicity. On M1-PET-CT, patients with a Deauville score > 3 had significantly shorter OS (median 7.9 months, versus not reached, Pv < 0.01). ΔSUVmax ≤ 66% on M1-PET-CT predicted shorter OS when M1-SUVmax was compared to TD-SUVmax (Pv = 0.02) but not to TT-SUVmax (Pv = 0.38).
conclusionPre-treatment SUVmax may guide patient selection for CAR-T therapy. On M1-PET-CT, Deauville score and ΔSUVmax from TD may identify early therapy failure. These parameters are easy to obtain and should be included in the PET-CT report.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34480603What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.