Observational studyTransfusion2021
Patterns of transfusion burden in an unselected population of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: A population-based study.
Observational study in Transfusion, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Imetelstat improves patient-reported outcomes and quality of life in lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: results from the phase III IMerge study.Haematologica · 2026Trial
- Longitudinal Changes in Transfusion Practice in Myelodysplastic Syndromes: A Population Data-Linkage Study.European journal of haematology · 2026Article
- Article
- Clinical view versus guideline adherence in ferritin monitoring and initiating iron chelation therapy in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.European journal of haematology · 2022Observational
- Increased prescription rate of anti-infective agents after diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndromes.EJHaem · 2022Article
- Patterns of transfusion burden in an unselected population of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: A population-based study.Transfusion · 2021Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIneffective hematopoiesis in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) often results in transfusion dependence. The burden of frequent transfusions in the real-world MDS population is largely unknown. STUDY DESIGN AND
methodsAn observational, retrospective, population-based study, using the HemoBase registry, was performed including all patients diagnosed with MDS between 2005 and 2017 in Friesland, a province in the Netherlands with approximately 650,000 inhabitants. Detailed clinical information was collected from the electronic health records. Transfusion burden was classified according to the International Working Group 2018 criteria: not transfusion dependent, low (LTB), or high transfusion burden (HTB). Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were performed.
resultsOf 292 patients, 136 (46.6%) had a HTB of ≥8 units/16 weeks and 17 (5.8%) had a LTB of 3-7 units/16 weeks. This was present in all types of MDS patients, but patients aged 75-84 years (odds ratio [OR] 4.02, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.84-8.82), high-risk MDS patients (OR 2.88, 95% CI: 1.08-7.68) and MDS-EB-2 patients (OR 7.07, 95% CI: 2.17-22.90) were particularly at risk for a HTB. DISCUSSION: This study provides a reliable estimate of the transfusion burden in real-world MDS patients, with almost half of the patients having a HTB. A HTB was observed in all MDS subtypes and both low- and high-risk MDS. Therefore, we conclude that the entire MDS population might benefit from novel agents that reduce the transfusion need and that might have beneficial effects on patient outcomes and healthcare utilization outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.