Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34480329›Full record

Trial reportPrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2022

Social Networks of Adolescent Sexual Violence Perpetrators: Peer Friendship and Trusted Adult Characteristics.

Dorothy L Espelage, Kelly L Rulison, Katherine M Ingram, Alberto Valido, Karen Schmeelk-Cone, Peter A Wyman

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01672541 (Randomized Controlled Trial of the "Dating Matters), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01672541 nacompletednot on this map

Randomized Controlled Trial of the "Dating Matters: Strategies to Promote Healthy Teen Relationships" Comprehensive Approach

TypeinterventionalSponsorCenters for Disease Control and PreventionRan2012 to 2018Enrolled10,000ConditionsTeen Dating Violence, Healthy Dating Relationship BehaviorsArmsDating Matters Comprehensive Approach, Standard of Care Safe Dates Approach
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Social Network Methods for Assigning Students to Teams.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dorothy L EspelageSchool of Education, University of North Carolina At Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA. espelage@unc.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0658-2067
Kelly L RulisonPennsylvania State University, University Park, USA.
Katherine M IngramUniversity of North Carolina At Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.
Alberto ValidoUniversity of North Carolina At Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.
Karen Schmeelk-ConeUniversity of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, USA.
Peter A WymanUniversity of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, USA.

Funding

The Impact of Sources of Strength, a Primary Prevention Youth Suicide Program, on Sexual Violence Perpetration among Colorado High School StudentsU01CE002841 · CE · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI ESPELAGE, DOROTHY L, WYMAN, PETER A · 2016 to 2019
$2.4M
NCIPC CDC HHS U01 CE002841
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current study tested differences in social network characteristics of high school students who report perpetrating sexual violence (SV) versus those who do not. N = 4554 students (49% male, 49% female, 2% another gender identity; 45% Hispanic, 43% white, 12% another racial identity) from 20 high schools reported how often they had perpetrated 13 sexually violent behaviors. Using their responses, students were classified as follows: non-perpetrators, sexual harassment perpetrators, low contact perpetrators, or high contact perpetrators. Students named up to 7 close friends and up to 7 trusted adults at their school and answered questions about other behaviors and attitudes. This information was used to assess (1) students' connections with peers, (2) students' connections with trusted adults, and (3) friends' characteristics. Multilevel models indicated that compared to their peers, high contact perpetrators were less involved in the peer networks, less connected to trusted adults, and more likely to have friends who were involved in risky behaviors (e.g., sexual violence, homophobic name-calling, substance use). Low contact perpetrators were as connected to peers and trusted adults as non-perpetrators but were more likely to have friends engaged in sexual violence and homophobic naming-calling perpetration. By contrast, sexual harassment perpetrators were more involved and held higher status in the peer network (e.g., received more friendship nominations) but otherwise had similar friendship characteristics and similar connections to trusted adults as non-perpetrators. Building on these results, social network-informed SV prevention should use opinion leaders to change SV norms throughout the network and encourage new relationships between low- and high-risk students so as to disseminate norms that do not tolerate SV. Promoting connections to trusted adults also may be a useful avenue, especially for isolated adolescents.Trial Registration This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT01672541. Syntax code is available from the authors upon request.

Indexed as

Sex OffensesSexual HarassmentAdolescentAdultFemaleFriendsGender IdentityHumansMalePeer GroupSocial NetworkingAdolescentsFriendshipsRapeSexual violenceSocial network

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.