Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34480318›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical review2022

Perioperative red blood cell transfusion is associated with poor functional outcome and overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Matthias Schneider, Niklas Schäfer, Anna-Laura Potthoff, Leonie Weinhold, Lars Eichhorn, Johannes Weller, Elisa Scharnböck, Christina Schaub, Muriel Heimann, Erdem Güresir and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Safety of Intraoperative Cell Salvage in Cancer Surgery: An Updated Meta-Analysis of the Current Literature.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2022
    Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthias SchneiderDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany. matthias.schneider@ukbonn.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6025-7479
Niklas SchäferDivision of Clinical Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Anna-Laura PotthoffDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Leonie WeinholdInstitute of Medical Biometry, Informatics and Epidemiology (IMBIE), University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Lars EichhornDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Johannes WellerDivision of Clinical Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Elisa ScharnböckDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Christina SchaubDivision of Clinical Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Muriel HeimannDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Erdem GüresirDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Felix LehmannDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Hartmut VatterDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Ulrich HerrlingerDivision of Clinical Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Patrick SchussDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
University Hospital Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The influence of perioperative red blood cell (RBC) transfusion on prognosis of glioblastoma patients continues to be inconclusive. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the association between perioperative blood transfusion (PBT) and overall survival (OS) in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Between 2013 and 2018, 240 patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma underwent surgical resection of intracerebral mass lesion at the authors' institution. PBT was defined as the transfusion of RBC within 5 days from the day of surgery. The impact of PBT on overall survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate regression analysis. Seventeen out of 240 patients (7%) with newly diagnosed glioblastoma received PBT. The overall median number of blood units transfused was 2 (95% CI 1-6). Patients who received PBT achieved a poorer median OS compared to patients without PBT (7 versus 18 months; p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis identified "age > 65 years" (p < 0.0001, OR 6.4, 95% CI 3.3-12.3), "STR" (p = 0.001, OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.6-6.1), "unmethylated MGMT status" (p < 0.001, OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.7-6.4), and "perioperative RBC transfusion" (p = 0.01, OR 6.0, 95% CI 1.5-23.4) as significantly and independently associated with 1-year mortality. Perioperative RBC transfusion compromises survival in patients with glioblastoma indicating the need to minimize the use of transfusions at the time of surgery. Obeying evidence-based transfusion guidelines provides an opportunity to reduce transfusion rates in this population with a potentially positive effect on survival.

Indexed as

GlioblastomaAgedBlood TransfusionErythrocyte TransfusionHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateRetrospective StudiesBrain tumorCancerGlioblastomaPerioperative blood transfusionRBCSurvival

Identifiers

PMID34480318
PMCPMC8976811
OpenAlexW3196838652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.