Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34480238›Full record

Observational studyJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2022

Assessment of different computing methods of inspiratory transpulmonary pressure in patients with multiple mechanical problems.

Kamil İnci, Nazlıhan Boyacı, İskender Kara, Gül Gürsel

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kamil İnciCritical Care Training Programme, Division of Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
Nazlıhan BoyacıCritical Care Training Programme, Division of Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
İskender KaraCritical Care Training Programme, Division of Critical Care, Department of Anaesthesiology, School of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey. driskenderkara@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2753-3670
Gül GürselCritical Care Training Programme, Department of Pulmonary Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
Gazi University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While plateau airway pressure alone is an unreliable estimate of lung overdistension inspiratory transpulmonary pressure (PL) is an important parameter to reflect it in patients with ARDS and there is no concensus about which computation method should be used to calculate it. Recent studies suggest that different formulas may lead to different tidal volume and PEEP settings. The aim of this study is to compare 3 different inspiratory PL measurement method; direct measurement (PL

Indexed as

Positive-Pressure RespirationRespiratory Distress SyndromeAgedAged, 80 and overHumansLungMiddle AgedPressureRespiratory MechanicsTidal VolumeARDSEosephageal pressureİntensive careMechanical ventilationRespiratory failureTranspulmonary pressure

Identifiers

PMID34480238
PMCPMC8415196
OpenAlexW3197585763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.