Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34480221›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2021

Evaluation of electronic pheromone trap capture conditions for Ips sexdentatus with climatic and temporal factors.

Gonca Ece Özcan, Hakan Şükrü Tabak

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gonca Ece ÖzcanFaculty of Forestry, Department of Forestry Engineering, Kastamonu University, 37150, Kastamonu, Turkey. goncaece@kastamonu.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0141-1031
Hakan Şükrü TabakInstitute of Science, Kastamonu University, Forest Engineering Program, 37150, Kastamonu, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2320-2604
Kastamonu University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Controlling forest pests to maintain the sustainability of forests and ecosystem balance is one of the interests of modern forestry. In the evaluation of damage risks associated with forest pests, pheromone traps attract attention by providing early warnings. With the development of these traps in line with modern technology, more reliable data are obtained; these data are important in the identification and planning of pest management. In this study, a pheromone trap with electronic control unit was tested under field conditions. The capture of adult Ips sexdentatus under natural conditions during 103 days of the flying period was evaluated; 97.2% of the beetles captured in the trap were the target species. The comparison of the number of beetles recorded by the trap and manual counts revealed that the trap worked with an error margin of approximately 4%. However, no statistically significant difference was noted between these two counting methods. During the study, 59% of the total beetles were captured between May 27 and June 25. The average temperature at the period of the capture was 20.09 °C, average humidity was 66%, and average wind speed was 2.9 m/s. Of the captures, 73.9% occurred in the temperature range of 15-24.9 °C, 61.1% occurred in humidity range of 61-90%, 89.6% occurred at a wind speed of 0.3-5.4 m/s, and 77.3% occurred within the period from sunrise to sunset. When these four parameters were evaluated together, the most strongly associated parameter was daylight, followed by temperature, wind speed, and humidity.

Indexed as

ColeopteraWeevilsAnimalsEcosystemElectronicsEnvironmental MonitoringInsect ControlPheromonesPheromonesCrimean pineForest pestPheromone monitoringPrecision forestrySix-toothed bark beetle

Identifiers

PMID34480221
OpenAlexW3196799167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.