Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34480072›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Novel lipophosphonoxin-loaded polycaprolactone electrospun nanofiber dressing reduces Staphylococcus aureus induced wound infection in mice.

Duy Dinh Do Pham, Věra Jenčová, Miriam Kaňuchová, Jan Bayram, Ivana Grossová, Hubert Šuca, Lukáš Urban, Kristýna Havlíčková, Vít Novotný, Petr Mikeš and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Assessment ofBiomolecules · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Casein fibres for wound healing.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Nanofiber Carriers of Therapeutic Load: Current Trends.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Duy Dinh Do Pham *Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, Czech Academy of Sciences, Flemingovo nám. 2, 166 10, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
Věra Jenčová *Faculty of Science, Humanities and Education, Technical University of Liberec, Studentska 1402/2, 461 17, Liberec 1, Czech Republic.
Miriam Kaňuchová *Laboratory of Cell Interactions, Center of Clinical and Preclinical Research MediPark, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Trieda SNP 1, 040 11, Košice, Slovak Republic.
Jan Bayram *Prague Burn Centre, Third Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Královské Vinohrady, Šrobárova 50, 100 34, Prague 10, Czech Republic.
Ivana GrossováPrague Burn Centre, Third Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Královské Vinohrady, Šrobárova 50, 100 34, Prague 10, Czech Republic.
Hubert ŠucaPrague Burn Centre, Third Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Královské Vinohrady, Šrobárova 50, 100 34, Prague 10, Czech Republic.
Lukáš UrbanLaboratory of Cell Interactions, Center of Clinical and Preclinical Research MediPark, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Trieda SNP 1, 040 11, Košice, Slovak Republic.
Kristýna HavlíčkováFaculty of Science, Humanities and Education, Technical University of Liberec, Studentska 1402/2, 461 17, Liberec 1, Czech Republic.
Vít NovotnýThe Institute for Nanomaterials, Advanced Technologies and Innovation, Bendlova 1409/7, 460 01, Liberec 1, Czech Republic.
Petr MikešFaculty of Science, Humanities and Education, Technical University of Liberec, Studentska 1402/2, 461 17, Liberec 1, Czech Republic.
Viktor MojrInstitute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, Czech Academy of Sciences, Flemingovo nám. 2, 166 10, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
Nikifor AsatianiFaculty of Science, Humanities and Education, Technical University of Liberec, Studentska 1402/2, 461 17, Liberec 1, Czech Republic.
Eva Kuželová KošťákováFaculty of Science, Humanities and Education, Technical University of Liberec, Studentska 1402/2, 461 17, Liberec 1, Czech Republic.
Martina MaixnerováLaboratory of Bacterial Genetics, Centre for Epidemiology and Microbiology, National Institute of Public Health, Šrobárova 49/48, 100 00, Prague 10, Czech Republic.
Alena VlkováUnit for Biomedicine and Welfare of Laboratory Animals, National Institute of Public Health, Šrobárova 49/48, 100 00, Prague 10, Czech Republic.
Dragana VítovskáLaboratory of Microbial Genetics and Gene Expression, Institute of Microbiology, Czech Academy of Sciences V.V.I., Vídeňská 1083, 142 20, Prague 4, Czech Republic.
Hana ŠanderováLaboratory of Microbial Genetics and Gene Expression, Institute of Microbiology, Czech Academy of Sciences V.V.I., Vídeňská 1083, 142 20, Prague 4, Czech Republic.
Alexandr NemecLaboratory of Bacterial Genetics, Centre for Epidemiology and Microbiology, National Institute of Public Health, Šrobárova 49/48, 100 00, Prague 10, Czech Republic.
Libor KrásnýLaboratory of Microbial Genetics and Gene Expression, Institute of Microbiology, Czech Academy of Sciences V.V.I., Vídeňská 1083, 142 20, Prague 4, Czech Republic.
Robert ZajíčekPrague Burn Centre, Third Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Královské Vinohrady, Šrobárova 50, 100 34, Prague 10, Czech Republic.
David LukášFaculty of Science, Humanities and Education, Technical University of Liberec, Studentska 1402/2, 461 17, Liberec 1, Czech Republic.
Dominik RejmanInstitute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, Czech Academy of Sciences, Flemingovo nám. 2, 166 10, Prague 6, Czech Republic. rejman@uochb.cas.cz.
Peter GálLaboratory of Cell Interactions, Center of Clinical and Preclinical Research MediPark, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Trieda SNP 1, 040 11, Košice, Slovak Republic. pgal@vusch.sk.
Technical University of Liberec · CZUniversity Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady · CZCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry · CZCzech Academy of Sciences · CZNational Institute of Public Health · CZUniversity of Pavol Jozef Šafárik · SKCharles University · CZCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Microbiology · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Active wound dressings are attracting extensive attention in soft tissue repair and regeneration, including bacteria-infected skin wound healing. As the wide use of antibiotics leads to drug resistance we present here a new concept of wound dressings based on the polycaprolactone nanofiber scaffold (NANO) releasing second generation lipophosphonoxin (LPPO) as antibacterial agent. Firstly, we demonstrated in vitro that LPPO released from NANO exerted antibacterial activity while not impairing proliferation/differentiation of fibroblasts and keratinocytes. Secondly, using a mouse model we showed that NANO loaded with LPPO significantly reduced the Staphylococcus aureus counts in infected wounds as evaluated 7 days post-surgery. Furthermore, the rate of degradation and subsequent LPPO release in infected wounds was also facilitated by lytic enzymes secreted by inoculated bacteria. Finally, LPPO displayed negligible to no systemic absorption. In conclusion, the composite antibacterial NANO-LPPO-based dressing reduces the bacterial load and promotes skin repair, with the potential to treat wounds in clinical settings.

Indexed as

BandagesNanofibersStaphylococcus aureusAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsDisease Models, AnimalMiceStaphylococcal InfectionsWound HealingWound InfectionAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID34480072
PMCPMC8417216
OpenAlexW3197773216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.