ArticleClinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia2022
Worsening Quality of Life in Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients in Active Surveillance: A 12-Month Longitudinal Study.
Article in Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Understanding the factors influencing quality of life among survivors of Non-Hodgkin lymphoma after completing primary treatment: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Psychological distress and quality of life in patients with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Gender Disparities in Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Impact of Treatment Modality.European journal of haematology · 2025Article
- De-diagnosing chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: An ethical and scientific case for changing diagnostic criteria.HemaSphere · 2025Article
- Coping and Perception of Prognosis in Patients With Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma.The oncologist · 2024Article
- The inherited genetic contribution and polygenic risk score for risk of CLL and MBL: a narrative review.Leukemia & lymphoma · 2023Review
- Longitudinal assessment of quality of life in indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomas managed with active surveillance.Leukemia & lymphoma · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionNewly diagnosed indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (NHL/CLL) patients are often monitored for disease progression to delay the impact of cancer-directed therapy on patients' quality of life. However, research on quality of life in patients under active surveillance versus in cancer-directed treatment has yielded mixed results. This study examined distress and quality of life in indolent NHL/CLL patients in active surveillance or cancer-directed treatment over the first-year post-diagnosis. PATIENTS AND
methodsAdult patients (≥21 years) with newly diagnosed indolent NHL/CLL completed electronic self-report measure of distress and quality of life every 4 months over the course of a year for a total of 4 surveys. Fisher's exact test and t-tests were used to examine demographic and disease differences between patients receiving different treatments. Mixed-effect models were also used to compare overall differences between treatment status over time, accounting for missing values.
resultsThe sample consisted of 64 patients with known baseline treatment status who did not change treatments over the course of the study. Total quality of life and physical, social and functional quality of life improved over time in patients receiving cancer-directed treatment and decreased over time in patients under active surveillance. Relative to patients in active treatment, overall, social, and functional quality of life in patients under surveillance changed more slowly over time. DISCUSSION: Active surveillance may have negative implications for patient quality of life, despite that a common goal of active surveillance is to delay the impact of treatment (e.g., appointments, toxicities) on quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.