Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34479746›Full record

Trial reportPatient education and counseling2022

Vaccine for yourself, your community, or your country? Examining audiences' response to distance framing of COVID-19 vaccine messages.

Shupei Yuan, Haoran Chu

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Patient education and counseling, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05808413 (Promoting Protection of Others to Increase Future COVID-19 Booster Shot Vaccination Intentions in Younger Adult Canadians), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05808413 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Promoting Protection of Others to Increase Future COVID-19 Booster Shot Vaccination Intentions in Younger Adult Canadians: Evaluating the Efficacy of Short Video-based Interventions

TypeinterventionalSponsorSir Mortimer B. Davis - Jewish General HospitalRan2023 to 2023Enrolled3,567ConditionsVaccine Refusal, COVID-19ArmsInformational Video, Altruistic Video, Individualistic Video
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Interventions to increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake: a scoping review.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shupei YuanDepartment of Communication Northern Illinois University DeKalb, IL 60008, USA. Electronic address: syuan@niu.edu.
Haoran ChuCollege of Journalism and Communications University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA. Electronic address: chu.h@ufl.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study explored the effects of COVID-19 vaccine promotion messages highlighting the benefit at individual, community, and country levels. Based on the cultural theory of risks, we investigated how individuals' valuation of individualism vs. communitarianism and hierarchical vs. egalitarian social structure affect their responses to vaccine messages.

methodsAn online experiment (N = 702) with four video message conditions (individual-centered, community-centered, country-centered, and no message) was conducted. Participants were asked about their cultural cognition worldview, then were randomly assigned to view one message. Participants also reported their willingness to receive COVID-19 vaccines and support for vaccine mandate.

resultsRespondents were more likely to get vaccinated and support vaccine mandates after viewing an individual-centered message, less with a community-centered message. Individuals who value individualism were more likely to respond positively to individual-centered messages, but those who believe more in communitarianism value were less likely.

conclusionResults showed that individuals are motivated selectively to respond to certain claims that cohere with their worldview and therefore respond differently to vaccine benefit frames. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The results point to the importance of understanding audiences' worldviews. By identifying this process through hierarchical and individualistic values, properly designed health promotion messages can maximize the desired outcomes.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesCOVID-19 VaccinesHealth PromotionHumansSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 VaccinesVaccinesBenefit framesCultural cognitionHealth communicationVaccine message

Identifiers

PMID34479746
PMCPMC8384529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.