ArticleJournal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine2021
Local plant knowledge and its variation among farmer's families in the Napf region, Switzerland.
Article in Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Young adults in eastern Germany know dandelion and sparrows but few farmland species.Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine · 2026Article
- Frequency of diseases and use of medicinal plants in adults in a rural Peruvian community.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Ethnobryology in e-commerce: traditional uses and emerging applications of bryophytes in China's online market.Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine · 2025Article
- Ethnobotanical Study of Medicinal Shrubs and Herbs Used by Forest-Fringe Communities of Ghana.Scientifica · 2025Article
- From soil to health: advancing regenerative agriculture for improved food quality and nutrition security.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Review
- Wild food plant knowledge in multicultural peri-urban area of North-Western Punjab, Pakistan.Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine · 2024Article
- Can family structure and contact with natural resources influence young people's knowledge about medicinal plants? An approach in the Northeast of Brazil.Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine · 2024Article
- Farmers' knowledge in the Swiss canton Valais: cultural heritage with future significance for European veterinary medicine?Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine · 2024Article
- Are we romanticizing traditional knowledge? A plea for more experimental studies in ethnobiology.Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine · 2024Article
- Ethnomedicinal plants in Champadevi rural municipality, Okhaldhunga district, Nepal.Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine · 2023Article
- Ethnobotany and conservation of the speciesHeliyon · 2023Article
- Temporal Changes in the Use of Wild Medicinal Plants in Trentino-South Tyrol, Northern Italy.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Green Christmas: bryophytes as ornamentals in Croatian traditional nativity scenes.Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLocal plant knowledge typically is unevenly distributed within a community. This knowledge variation is important in understanding people's relationship with their environment. Here we ask about knowledge variation among farmers' families in the Napf region of Switzerland.
methodsIn 2008 and 2009, 60 adults and children living on 14 farms were interviewed about known and used plant species, and the data analyzed for knowledge variation. The farms were chosen by random stratified sampling, and freelisting and semi-structured interviews were conducted individually in the local idiom. The data were organized in an access database and analyzed with descriptive statistics, correlations, Mann-Whitney U tests and cultural domain analysis.
resultsTotally, 456 folk taxa were listed, whereas frequently listed species are common meadow and forest species. Uses were indicated for 391 taxa, most of them culinary, followed by fodder, wood, medicinal and ornamental uses. Local plant knowledge correlates with age and gender. Due to professional specialization, adults above 20 years have broader plant knowledge than children and adolescents. This is true for almost all examined habitat and plant use categories except for toy uses. Women and men share a common body of plant knowledge especially about herbaceous grassland species and woody species. Specialized knowledge of men is linked to cattle fodder and the processing of wood, specialized knowledge of women concerns edible, medicinal and ornamental plants, often garden species, but also herbaceous forest species.
conclusionIn a rural region like the Napf, people retain a solid basis of plant knowledge. The variation of plant knowledge within farmers' families of this region reflects sociocultural patterns. As these patterns are changing and as (agro)biodiversity is declining, local plant knowledge in the Napf region is suspected to undergo a mainstreaming process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.