Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34479457›Full record

SynthesisPalliative medicine2021

End of life care for people with severe mental illness: Mixed methods systematic review and thematic synthesis (the MENLOC study).

Deborah Edwards, Sally Anstey, Michael Coffey, Paul Gill, Mala Mann, Alan Meudell, Ben Hannigan

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Palliative medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Delivering Palliative Care in Mental Health Nursing Settings: A Systematic Review.Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Challenges in the End-of-Life Care for Patients With Severe Persistent Mental Illness: A Case Series.Psychogeriatrics : the official journal of the Japanese Psychogeriatric Society · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Clinician Perspectives on Palliative Care for Older Adults With Serious Mental Illnesses: A Multisite Qualitative Study.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Deborah EdwardsSchool of Healthcare Sciences, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1885-9297
Sally AnsteySchool of Healthcare Sciences, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Michael CoffeyDepartment of Public Health, Policy and Social Sciences, College of Human and Health Sciences, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0380-4704
Paul GillSchool of Healthcare Sciences, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Mala MannSpecialist Unit for Review Evidence, University Library Services, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2554-9265
Alan MeudellIndependent Service User Researcher, Caerphilly, UK.
Ben HanniganSchool of Healthcare Sciences, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2512-6721

Funding

Marie Curie MCCC-FCO-11-C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParity of esteem means that end-of-life care for people with severe mental illness should be of equal quality to that experienced by all.

aimTo synthesise international, English language, research and UK policy and guidance relating to the organisation, provision, and receipt of end-of-life care for people with severe mental illness.

designA mixed methods systematic review was conducted following the Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and Co-ordinating Centre approach and informed by a stakeholder group. We employed thematic synthesis to bring together data from both qualitative and quantitative studies, and from non-research material. We assessed the strength of synthesised findings using the Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research (CERQual) and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approaches. DATA SOURCES: Ten electronic databases were searched from inception to December 2019, along with 62 organisational websites. Quality appraisal was conducted using Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklists or other study design-specific alternatives as necessary.

resultsOf the 11,904 citations retrieved, 34 research publications were included plus 28 non-research items. The majority of research was of high or acceptable quality. An overarching synthesis including 52 summary statements, with assessments of confidence in the underpinning evidence, was produced using four themes:

conclusionsImplications for services and practice reflect evidence in which there is a high degree of confidence. Partnership should be developed across the mental health and end-of-life systems, and ways found to support people to die where they choose. Staff caring for people with severe mental illness at the end-of-life need education, support and supervision. End-of-life care for people with severe mental illness requires a team approach, including advocacy. Proactive physical health care for people with severe mental illness is needed to tackle problems of delayed diagnosis.

Indexed as

Hospice CareMental DisordersTerminal CareHumansQualitative ResearchDiseaseshealth services administrationintersectoral collaborationmental disordersneoplasmssystematic reviewthematic synthesis

Identifiers

PMID34479457
PMCPMC8637363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.