ArticleClinical imaging2021
Evaluating current chest imaging practices of pediatric patients with COVID-19: A retrospective analysis.
Article in Clinical imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiographic patterns and severity scoring of COVID-19 pneumonia in children: a retrospective study.BMC medical imaging · 2023Article
- Imaging findings in acute pediatric coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia and multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C).Pediatric radiology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis retrospective analysis aims to examine the effectiveness of the current chest imaging guidelines regarding COVID-19 positive pediatric patients on our study group of patients aged 0 to 18. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe examined clinical and imaging data of 178 pediatric COVID-19 positive patients confirmed by PCR admitted to the Children's Hospital of Los Angeles between March 6, 2020 and June 23, 2020.
resultsOf 178 patients, only 46 (27%) patients underwent any form of chest imaging. Thirteen (28%) of 46 imaged patients had positive chest X-rays (CXR) or computed tomography (CT) chest findings, with 8 (62%) of the 13 patients suggesting pneumonia or multifocal pneumonia, 3 (23%) patients having acute respiratory distress syndrome, and 2 (15%) patients demonstrating left sided pleural effusions thought to be the result of ruptured appendicitis unrelated to their COVID-19 diagnosis. All but one patient had significant prior medical histories with an associated comorbid medical condition. Of the 46 imaged patients, 17 (37%) patients had a negative chest X-ray, and 15 (33%) patients had suggestive findings of viral etiology. 132 patients were not imaged.
conclusionOur study population corroborated current chest imaging guidelines in pediatric patients. Chest imaging modalities such as CXR and CT should be reserved for patients who are severely symptomatic and/or possess prior comorbidities such as immunosuppression, diabetes, asthma, obesity, or where other differential etiologies must be entertained.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.