Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34478709›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2021

In silico and in vitro analysis of an Aspergillus niger chitin deacetylase to decipher its subsite sugar preferences.

Martin Bonin, Lisanne Hameleers, Lea Hembach, Thomas Roret, Stefan Cord-Landwehr, Gurvan Michel, Bruno M Moerschbacher

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Martin BoninUniversity of Münster, Institute for Biology and Biotechnology of Plants, Münster, Germany.
Lisanne HameleersUniversity of Münster, Institute for Biology and Biotechnology of Plants, Münster, Germany.
Lea HembachUniversity of Münster, Institute for Biology and Biotechnology of Plants, Münster, Germany.
Thomas RoretSorbonne Université, CNRS, FR 2424, Station Biologique de Roscoff (SBR), Roscoff, France.
Stefan Cord-LandwehrUniversity of Münster, Institute for Biology and Biotechnology of Plants, Münster, Germany.
Gurvan MichelSorbonne Université, CNRS, Integrative Biology of Marine Models (LBI2M), Station Biologique de Roscoff (SBR), Roscoff, France.
Bruno M MoerschbacherUniversity of Münster, Institute for Biology and Biotechnology of Plants, Münster, Germany. Electronic address: moersch@uni-muenster.de.
University of Münster · DECentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chitin deacetylases (CDAs) are found in many different organisms ranging from marine bacteria to fungi and insects. These enzymes catalyze the removal of acetyl groups from chitinous substrates generating various chitosans, linear copolymers consisting of N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) and glucosamine. CDAs influence the degree of acetylation of chitosans as well as their pattern of acetylation, a parameter that was recently shown to influence the physicochemical properties and biological activities of chitosans. The binding site of CDAs typically consists of around four subsites, each accommodating a single sugar unit of the substrate. It has been hypothesized that the subsite preferences for GlcNAc or glucosamine units play a crucial role in the acetylation pattern they generate, but so far, this characteristic was largely ignored and still lacks structural data on the involved residues. Here, we determined the crystal structure of an Aspergillus niger CDA. Then, we used molecular dynamics simulations, backed up with a variety of in vitro activity assays using different well-defined polymeric and oligomeric substrates, to study this CDA in detail. We found that Aspergillus niger CDA strongly prefers a GlcNAc sugar unit at its -1 subsite and shows a weak GlcNAc preference at the other noncatalytic subsites, which was apparent both when deacetylating and N-acetylating oligomeric substrates. Overall, our results show that the combination of in vitro and in silico methods used here enables the detailed analysis of CDAs, including their subsite preferences, which could influence their substrate targets and the characteristics of chitosans produced by these species.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationAcetylglucosamineAmidohydrolasesAspergillus nigerCrystallography, X-RayFungal ProteinsProtein DomainsSubstrate SpecificityAcetylglucosamineAmidohydrolaseschitin deacetylaseFungal Proteinscarbohydrate biosynthesiscarbohydrate functionchitosancrystal structureenzyme mechanismmolecular dockingmolecular dynamics

Identifiers

PMID34478709
PMCPMC8488497
OpenAlexW3197226516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.