Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34478476›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Inconsistent PCR detection of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli: Insights from whole genome sequence analyses.

Vinicius Silva Castro, Rodrigo Ortega Polo, Eduardo Eustáquio de Souza Figueiredo, Emmanuel Wihkochombom Bumunange, Tim McAllister, Robin King, Carlos Adam Conte-Junior, Kim Stanford

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Heat-resistant and biofilm-forming Escherichia coli in pasteurized milk from Brazil.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The "Big Six": Hidden Emerging Foodborne Bacterial Pathogens.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Vinicius Silva CastroInstitute of Chemistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4746-0237
Rodrigo Ortega PoloLethbridge Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, Canada.
Eduardo Eustáquio de Souza FigueiredoDepartment of Food and Nutrition, Federal University of Mato Grosso, Cuiaba, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2608-4324
Emmanuel Wihkochombom BumunangeDepartment of Ecosystem and Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Tim McAllisterLethbridge Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, Canada.
Robin KingAlberta Agriculture and Forestry, Edmonton, Canada.
Carlos Adam Conte-JuniorInstitute of Chemistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6133-5080
Kim StanfordDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8784-0042
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada · CAUniversity of Lethbridge · CAAlberta Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry · CAUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) have been linked to food-borne disease outbreaks. As PCR is routinely used to screen foods for STEC, it is important that factors leading to inconsistent detection of STEC by PCR are understood. This study used whole genome sequencing (WGS) to investigate causes of inconsistent PCR detection of stx1, stx2, and serogroup-specific genes. Fifty strains isolated from Alberta feedlot cattle from three different studies were selected with inconsistent or consistent detection of stx and serogroup by PCR. All isolates were initially classified as STEC by PCR. Sequencing was performed using Illumina MiSeq® with sample library by Nextera XT. Virtual PCRs were performed using Geneious and bacteriophage content was determined using PHASTER. Sequencing coverage ranged from 47 to 102x, averaging 74x, with sequences deposited in the NCBI database. Eleven strains were confirmed by WGS as STEC having complete stxA and stxB subunits. However, truncated stx fragments occurred in twenty-two other isolates, some having multiple stx fragments in the genome. Isolates with complete stx by WGS had consistent stx1 and stx2 detection by PCR, although one also having a stx2 fragment had inconsistent stx2 PCR. For all STEC and 18/39 non-STEC, serogroups determined by PCR agreed with those determined by WGS. An additional three WGS serotypes were inconclusive and two isolates were Citrobacter spp. Results demonstrate that stx fragments associated with stx-carrying bacteriophages in the E. coli genome may contribute to inconsistent detection of stx1 and stx2 by PCR. Fourteen isolates had integrated stx bacteriophage but lacked complete or fragmentary stx possibly due to partial bacteriophage excision after sub-cultivation or other unclear mechanisms. The majority of STEC isolates (7/11) did not have identifiable bacteriophage DNA in the contig(s) where stx was located, likely increasing the stability of stx in the bacterial genome and its detection by PCR.

Indexed as

Whole Genome SequencingBacteriophagesBase SequenceBiofilmsMultilocus Sequence TypingPhylogenyPlasmidsPolymerase Chain ReactionPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSerogroupShiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli

Identifiers

PMID34478476
PMCPMC8415614
OpenAlexW3197027706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.