ArticleCancer cytopathology2022
A multi-institutional study of salivary gland cytopathology: Application of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology in Japan.
Article in Cancer cytopathology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Application of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Cancer cytopathology · 2022Pooled it
- Limitations of FNAC in detecting parotid malignancies: insights from a surgical cohort using the updated Milan System.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
- Optimizing preoperative assessment of salivary gland lesions: updates and practical implications in the Milan System 2nd edition.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Review
- Cytological features of oncocytic pleomorphic adenoma of the salivary gland: Using the Milan classification system to report 3 patients.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Cytological features of a lymphoepithelial cyst of the salivary gland with application of the second edition of Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2024Article
- The Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology-A single-center study of 2156 cases.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Nondiagnostic category of Milan System for Reporting Pediatric Salivary Gland Cytopathology: outcomes and root cause analysis.Cancer cytopathology · 2022Article
- A multi-institutional study of salivary gland cytopathology: Application of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology in Japan.Cancer cytopathology · 2022Article
- The Second Edition of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology: System Application, Outcome, and Cytohistological Correlation.Journal of cytologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) is a risk-stratification reporting system that was introduced in 2018. The objective of this multi-institutional study was to evaluate the utility of the MSRSGC in Japan.
methodsIn total, 1608 fine-needle aspiration samples with matching histologic diagnoses were retrieved from 12 large institutions in Japan. The diagnostic categories of the MSRSGC were assigned prospectively or retrospectively, and the results were compared with the histologic diagnoses.
resultsThe cases were classified as follows: nondiagnostic, 18.1%; non-neoplastic, 4.1%; atypia of undetermined significance, 11.5%; neoplasm-benign, 43.7%; salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential, 9.6%; suspicious for malignancy, 3.6%; and malignant, 9.4%. The risk of neoplasm and the risk of malignancy in each MSRSGC category were as follows: nondiagnostic, 72.9% and 13.4%, respectively; non-neoplastic, 15.2% and 9.1%, respectively; atypia of undetermined significance, 77.9% and 24.9%, respectively; neoplasm-benign, 99% and 1.8%, respectively; salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential, 94.8% and 37%, respectively; suspicious for malignancy, 100% and 89.7%, respectively; and malignant, 100% and 99.3%, respectively. The accuracy of the MSRSGC for diagnosing neoplasms was 97.8%, and its accuracy for diagnosing malignancy was 97.3%. Institutions that used Romanowsky-stained preparations had lower nondiagnostic rates and lower risks of neoplasm and malignancy in the non-neoplastic category.
conclusionsThe MSRSGC is useful for risk stratification and quality control. Widespread use of the MSRSGC would improve the accuracy of salivary gland cytology and lead to better patient care in Japan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.