Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34477921›Full record

ReviewDer Pathologe2021

MSI testing : What's new? What should be considered?

Josef Rüschoff, Gustavo Baretton, Hendrik Bläker, Wolfgang Dietmaier, Manfred Dietel, Arndt Hartmann, Lars-Christian Horn, Korinna Jöhrens, Thomas Kirchner, Ruth Knüchel and 8 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Pathologe, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The PD-1/PD-L1 Pathway: A Perspective on Comparative Immuno-Oncology.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
  9. Dostarlimab: A Review.Biomolecules · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Josef RüschoffInstitute of Pathology, Nordhessen und Targos Molecular Pathology GmbH, Germaniastr. 7, 34119, Kassel, Germany. josef.rueschoff@targos-gmbh.de.
Gustavo BarettonInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Hendrik BläkerInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstr. 26, Gebäude G, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Wolfgang DietmaierInstitute of Pathology, Center of Molecular Pathological Diagnostics, Universität Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Manfred DietelInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Charité, Campus Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Arndt HartmannPathological Institute, University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Krankenhausstr. 8-10, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Lars-Christian HornInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstr. 26, Gebäude G, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Korinna JöhrensInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Thomas KirchnerPathological Institute, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Thalkirchner Str. 36, 80337, München, Germany.
Ruth KnüchelInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Doris MayrPathological Institute, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Thalkirchner Str. 36, 80337, München, Germany.
Sabine Merkelbach-BruseInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Germany.
Hans-Ulrich SchildhausInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Peter SchirmacherPathological Institute, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 224, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Markus TiemannFangdieckstr. 75a, Institute of Hematopathology Hamburg, 22547, Hamburg, Germany.
Katharina TiemannFangdieckstr. 75a, Institute of Hematopathology Hamburg, 22547, Hamburg, Germany.
Wilko WeichertInstitute of Pathology, Technical University Munich, Trogerstr. 18, 81675, München, Germany.
Reinhard BüttnerInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Germany.
Institut für Hämatopathologie Hamburg · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DEUniversity Hospital Cologne · DEUniversity Hospital Leipzig · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEEssen University Hospital · DERWTH Aachen University · DETechnical University of Munich · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DEUniversity of Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Based on new trial data regarding immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the detection of high-grade microsatellite instability (MSI-H) or underlying deficient mismatch repair protein (dMMR) is now becoming increasingly important for predicting treatment response. For the first time, a PD‑1 ICI (pembrolizumab) has been approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for first-line treatment of advanced (stage IV) dMMR/MSI‑H colorectal cancer (CRC). Further indications, such as dMMR/MSI‑H endometrial carcinoma (EC), have already succeeded (Dostarlimab, 2nd line treatment) and others are expected to follow before the end of 2021. The question of optimal testing in routine diagnostics should therefore be re-evaluated. Based on a consideration of the strengths and weaknesses of the widely available methods (immunohistochemistry and PCR), a test algorithm is proposed that allows quality assured, reliable, and cost-effective dMMR/MSI‑H testing. For CRC and EC, testing is therefore already possible at the primary diagnosis stage, in line with international recommendations (NICE, NCCN). The clinician is therefore enabled from the outset to consider not only the predictive but also the prognostic and predispositional implications of such a test when counseling patients and formulating treatment recommendations. As a basis for quality assurance, participation in interlaboratory comparisons and continuous documentation of results (e.g., QuIP Monitor) are strongly recommended.

Indexed as

Microsatellite InstabilityDNA Mismatch RepairFemaleHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunohistochemistryNeoplasmsPrognosisImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsDNA mismatch repairEndometrial carcinomaImmune checkpoint inhibitorsMicrosatellite instabilityPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID34477921
OpenAlexW3197373370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.