Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34477847›Full record

Observational studyJAMA network open2021

Steps per Day and All-Cause Mortality in Middle-aged Adults in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study.

Amanda E Paluch, Kelley Pettee Gabriel, Janet E Fulton, Cora E Lewis, Pamela J Schreiner, Barbara Sternfeld, Stephen Sidney, Juned Siddique, Kara M Whitaker, Mercedes R Carnethon

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
14.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 166 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Amanda E PaluchInstitute for Applied Life Sciences, Department of Kinesiology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Kelley Pettee GabrielDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Janet E FultonDivision of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Cora E LewisDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Pamela J SchreinerDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Barbara SternfeldDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Stephen SidneyDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Juned SiddiqueDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Kara M WhitakerDepartment of Health and Human Physiology, Department of Epidemiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
Mercedes R CarnethonDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Kaiser Permanente · USNorthwestern University · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USNational Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion · USUniversity of Iowa · USUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Research Design, Data, and Analytics CoreP30DK092949 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Ronald T. Ackermann, MARSHALL H CHIN · 2011 to 2026
$10.0M
Statistical methods for estimating relative intensity physical activity and its association with cardiometabolic diseaseR01HL131606 · NHLBI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI SIDDIQUE, JUNED · 2017 to 2018
$288k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL131606NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Steps per day is a meaningful metric for physical activity promotion in clinical and population settings. To guide promotion strategies of step goals, it is important to understand the association of steps with clinical end points, including mortality. Objective: To estimate the association of steps per day with premature (age 41-65 years) all-cause mortality among Black and White men and women. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study was part of the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study. Participants were aged 38 to 50 years and wore an accelerometer from 2005 to 2006. Participants were followed for a mean (SD) of 10.8 (0.9) years. Data were analyzed in 2020 and 2021. Exposure: Daily steps volume, classified as low (<7000 steps/d), moderate (7000-9999 steps/d), and high (≥10 000 steps/d) and stepping intensity, classified as peak 30-minute stepping rate and time spent at 100 steps/min or more. Main Outcomes and Measures: All-cause mortality. Results: A total of 2110 participants from the CARDIA study were included, with a mean (SD) age of 45.2 (3.6) years, 1205 (57.1%) women, 888 (42.1%) Black participants, and a median (interquartile range [IQR]) of 9146 (7307-11 162) steps/d. During 22 845 person years of follow-up, 72 participants (3.4%) died. Using multivariable adjusted Cox proportional hazards models, compared with participants in the low step group, there was significantly lower risk of mortality in the moderate (hazard ratio [HR], 0.28 [95% CI, 0.15-0.54]; risk difference [RD], 53 [95% CI, 27-78] events per 1000 people) and high (HR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.25-0.81]; RD, 41 [95% CI, 15-68] events per 1000 people) step groups. Compared with the low step group, moderate/high step rate was associated with reduced risk of mortality in Black participants (HR, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.14-0.63]) and in White participants (HR, 0.37 [95% CI, 0.17-0.81]). Similarly, compared with the low step group, moderate/high step rate was associated with reduce risk of mortality in women (HR, 0.28 [95% CI, 0.12-0.63]) and men (HR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.20-0.88]). There was no significant association between peak 30-minute intensity (lowest vs highest tertile: HR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.54-1.77]) or time at 100 steps/min or more (lowest vs highest tertile: HR, 1.38 [95% CI, 0.73-2.61]) with risk of mortality. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found that among Black and White men and women in middle adulthood, participants who took approximately 7000 steps/d or more experienced lower mortality rates compared with participants taking fewer than 7000 steps/d. There was no association of step intensity with mortality.

Indexed as

AccelerometryAdolescentAdultBlack PeopleCause of DeathCoronary Artery DiseaseFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMortality, PrematureProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesWhite People

Identifiers

PMID34477847
PMCPMC8417757
OpenAlexW3198175828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.