Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34477846›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2021

Rapid high-resolution detection of colistin resistance in Gram-negative bacteria using flow cytometry: a comparison with broth microdilution, a commercial screening test and WGS.

Oskar Ekelund, Marit Andrea Klokkhammer Hetland, Iren Høyland Löhr, Thomas Schön, Sofia Somajo

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Expanded Gram-Negative Activity of Marinopyrrole A.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Sensing of Antibiotic-Bacteria Interactions.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Oskar EkelundDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Växjö Central Hospital, Växjö, Sweden.
Marit Andrea Klokkhammer HetlandDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-4247-8304
Iren Høyland LöhrDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Thomas SchönDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Division of Infectious Diseases, Linköping University, Sweden.
Sofia SomajoDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Blekinge County Hospital, Karlskrona, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0433-8079
Region Blekinge · SEStavanger University Hospital · NOLinköping University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEven though both EUCAST and CLSI consider broth microdilution (BMD) as the reference method for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of colistin, the method exhibits potential flaws related to properties of the colistin molecule.

objectivesTo develop a flow cytometry method (FCM) for colistin AST and to validate it against BMD, a commercial screening test and WGS.

methodsColistin-mediated loss of membrane integrity in Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp. was detected with the fluorescent probe YoPro-1 by FCM. An international collection of 65 resistant and 109 susceptible isolates were analysed and the colistin concentration required to reach the EC50 was compared with the BMD MIC and the presence of genotypic resistance markers.

resultsThe overall FCM sensitivity and specificity for colistin resistance was 89% and 94%, with E. coli > K. pneumoniae > P. aeruginosa, whereas the performance for Acinetobacter spp. was poor. All tested E. coli were correctly categorized. Three K. pneumoniae isolates with genotypic findings consistent with colistin resistance were detected by FCM but not BMD. Compared with BMD, FCM delivered AST results with a 75% reduction of time.

conclusionsHere, we present a rapid FCM-based AST assay for qualitative and quantitative testing of colistin resistance in E. coli and K. pneumoniae. The assay revealed probable chromosomal colistin resistance in K. pneumoniae that was not detected by BMD. If confirmed, these results question the reliability of BMD for colistin testing.

Indexed as

ColistinEscherichia coliAnti-Bacterial AgentsFlow CytometryGram-Negative BacteriaMicrobial Sensitivity TestsReproducibility of ResultsAnti-Bacterial AgentsColistin

Identifiers

PMID34477846
PMCPMC8598304
OpenAlexW3198162353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.