Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34477808›Full record

ArticleJAMA2021

Surveillance for Adverse Events After COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination.

Nicola P Klein, Ned Lewis, Kristin Goddard, Bruce Fireman, Ousseny Zerbo, Kayla E Hanson, James G Donahue, Elyse O Kharbanda, Allison Naleway, Jennifer Clark Nelson and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 397 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
397citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

397 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article

337 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Nicola P KleinKaiser Permanente Vaccine Study Center, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Ned LewisKaiser Permanente Vaccine Study Center, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Kristin GoddardKaiser Permanente Vaccine Study Center, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Bruce FiremanKaiser Permanente Vaccine Study Center, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Ousseny ZerboKaiser Permanente Vaccine Study Center, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Kayla E HansonMarshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, Wisconsin.
James G DonahueMarshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, Wisconsin.
Elyse O KharbandaHealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Allison NalewayCenter for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon.
Jennifer Clark NelsonBiostatistics Unit, Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Stan XuResearch and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena.
W Katherine YihHarvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jason M GlanzInstitute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Denver.
Joshua T B WilliamsAmbulatory Care Services, Denver Health, Denver, Colorado.
Simon J HambidgeAmbulatory Care Services, Denver Health, Denver, Colorado.
Bruno J LewinResearch and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena.
Tom T ShimabukuroImmunization Safety Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Frank DeStefanoImmunization Safety Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Eric S WeintraubImmunization Safety Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Safety surveillance of vaccines against COVID-19 is critical to ensure safety, maintain trust, and inform policy. Objectives: To monitor 23 serious outcomes weekly, using comprehensive health records on a diverse population. Design, Setting, and Participants: This study represents an interim analysis of safety surveillance data from Vaccine Safety Datalink. The 10 162 227 vaccine-eligible members of 8 participating US health plans were monitored with administrative data updated weekly and supplemented with medical record review for selected outcomes from December 14, 2020, through June 26, 2021. Exposures: Receipt of BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) or mRNA-1273 (Moderna) COVID-19 vaccination, with a risk interval of 21 days for individuals after vaccine dose 1 or 2 compared with an interval of 22 to 42 days for similar individuals after vaccine dose 1 or 2. Main Outcomes and Measures: Incidence of serious outcomes, including acute myocardial infarction, Bell palsy, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, myocarditis/pericarditis, pulmonary embolism, stroke, and thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome. Incidence of events that occurred among vaccine recipients 1 to 21 days after either dose 1 or 2 of a messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine was compared with that of vaccinated concurrent comparators who, on the same calendar day, had received their most recent dose 22 to 42 days earlier. Rate ratios (RRs) were estimated by Poisson regression, adjusted for age, sex, race and ethnicity, health plan, and calendar day. For a signal, a 1-sided P < .0048 was required to keep type I error below .05 during 2 years of weekly analyses. For 4 additional outcomes, including anaphylaxis, only descriptive analyses were conducted. Results: A total of 11 845 128 doses of mRNA vaccines (57% BNT162b2; 6 175 813 first doses and 5 669 315 second doses) were administered to 6.2 million individuals (mean age, 49 years; 54% female individuals). The incidence of events per 1 000 000 person-years during the risk vs comparison intervals for ischemic stroke was 1612 vs 1781 (RR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.87-1.08); for appendicitis, 1179 vs 1345 (RR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.73-0.93); and for acute myocardial infarction, 935 vs 1030 (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.89-1.18). No vaccine-outcome association met the prespecified requirement for a signal. Incidence of confirmed anaphylaxis was 4.8 (95% CI, 3.2-6.9) per million doses of BNT162b2 and 5.1 (95% CI, 3.3-7.6) per million doses of mRNA-1273. Conclusions and Relevance: In interim analyses of surveillance of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, incidence of selected serious outcomes was not significantly higher 1 to 21 days postvaccination compared with 22 to 42 days postvaccination. While CIs were wide for many outcomes, surveillance is ongoing.

Indexed as

2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273AdolescentAdultAgedAnaphylaxisBNT162 VaccineChildCOVID-19 VaccinesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedmRNA VaccinesMyocarditisPublic Health Surveillance2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273BNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesmRNA VaccinesVaccines, Synthetic

Identifiers

PMID34477808
PMCPMC8511971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.