Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34477554›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2021

Implementation of Telehealth Services at the US Department of Veterans Affairs During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Mixed Methods Study.

Claudia Der-Martirosian, Tamar Wyte-Lake, Michelle Balut, Karen Chu, Leonie Heyworth, Lucinda Leung, Boback Ziaeian, Sarah Tubbesing, Rashmi Mullur, Aram Dobalian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Behavioral Health Trainee Satisfaction at the US Department of Veterans Affairs During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Telehealth Implementation Response to COVID-19 in the OneFlorida+ Clinical Research Network: Perspectives of Clinicians and Health Systems Leaders.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Telehealth Complementary and Integrative Health Therapies During COVID-19 at the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Claudia Der-MartirosianVeterans Emergency Management Evaluation Center, US Department of Veterans Affairs, North Hills, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6841-198X
Tamar Wyte-LakeVeterans Emergency Management Evaluation Center, US Department of Veterans Affairs, North Hills, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8449-7701
Michelle BalutVeterans Emergency Management Evaluation Center, US Department of Veterans Affairs, North Hills, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2548-2283
Karen ChuVeterans Emergency Management Evaluation Center, US Department of Veterans Affairs, North Hills, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3360-7944
Leonie HeyworthOffice of Connected Care/Telehealth Services, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3680-9402
Lucinda LeungCenter for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8103-8611
Boback ZiaeianCenter for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9787-3649
Sarah TubbesingCenter for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8410-483X
Rashmi MullurCenter for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2575-7160
Aram DobalianVeterans Emergency Management Evaluation Center, US Department of Veterans Affairs, North Hills, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9941-4275

Funding

HSRD VA IK2 HX002867
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAt the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a rapid increase in the use of telehealth services at the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), which was accelerated by state and local policies mandating stay-at-home orders and restricting nonurgent in-person appointments. Even though the VA was an early adopter of telehealth in the late 1990s, the vast majority of VA outpatient care continued to be face-to-face visits through February 2020.

objectiveWe compared telehealth service use at a VA Medical Center, Greater Los Angeles across 3 clinics (primary care [PC], cardiology, and home-based primary care [HBPC]) 12 months before and 12 months after the onset of COVID-19 (March 2020).

methodsWe used a parallel mixed methods approach including simultaneous quantitative and qualitative approaches. The distribution of monthly outpatient and telehealth visits, as well as telephone and VA Video Connect encounters were examined for each clinic. Semistructured telephone interviews were conducted with 34 staff involved in telehealth services within PC, cardiology, and HBPC during COVID-19. All audiotaped interviews were transcribed and analyzed by identifying key themes.

resultsPrior to COVID-19, telehealth use was minimal at all 3 clinics, but at the onset of COVID-19, telehealth use increased substantially at all 3 clinics. Telephone was the main modality of patient choice. Compared with PC and cardiology, video-based care had the greatest increase in HBPC. Several important barriers (multiple steps for videoconferencing, creation of new scheduling grids, and limited access to the internet and internet-connected devices) and facilitators (flexibility in using different video-capable platforms, technical support for patients, identification of staff telehealth champions, and development of workflows to help incorporate telehealth into treatment plans) were noted.

conclusionsTechnological issues must be addressed at the forefront of telehealth evolution to achieve access for all patient populations with different socioeconomic backgrounds, living situations and locations, and health conditions. The unprecedented expansion of telehealth during COVID-19 provides opportunities to create lasting telehealth solutions to improve access to care beyond the pandemic.

Indexed as

cardiologyCOVID-19home-based primary careprimary caretelehealthtelemedicineUS Department of Veterans Affairsveterans

Identifiers

PMID34477554
PMCPMC8462492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.