ArticleProteomics2021
SGLT2-Inhibition reverts urinary peptide changes associated with severe COVID-19: An in-silico proof-of-principle of proteomics-based drug repurposing.
Article in Proteomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of urinary peptide-biomarkers in trauma patients as a predictive tool for prognostic assessment, treatment and intervention timing.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Exploratory Study Analyzing the Urinary Peptidome of T2DM Patients Suggests Changes in ECM but Also Inflammatory and Metabolic Pathways Following GLP-1R Agonist Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Reproducibility Evaluation of Urinary Peptide Detection Using CE-MS.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- SGLT2-Inhibition reverts urinary peptide changes associated with severe COVID-19: An in-silico proof-of-principle of proteomics-based drug repurposing.Proteomics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Severe COVID-19 is reflected by significant changes in urine peptides. Based on this observation, a clinical test predicting COVID-19 severity, CoV50, was developed and registered as in vitro diagnostic in Germany. We have hypothesized that molecular changes displayed by CoV50, likely reflective of endothelial damage, may be reversed by specific drugs. Such an impact by a drug could indicate potential benefits in the context of COVID-19. To test this hypothesis, urinary peptide data from patients without COVID-19 prior to and after drug treatment were collected from the human urinary proteome database. The drugs chosen were selected based on availability of sufficient number of participants in the dataset (n > 20) and potential value of drug therapies in the treatment of COVID-19 based on reports in the literature. In these participants without COVID-19, spironolactone did not demonstrate a significant impact on CoV50 scoring. Empagliflozin treatment resulted in a significant change in CoV50 scoring, indicative of a potential therapeutic benefit. The study serves as a proof-of-principle for a drug repurposing approach based on human urinary peptide signatures. The results support the initiation of a randomized control trial testing a potential positive effect of empagliflozin for severe COVID-19, possibly via endothelial protective mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.