Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34477108›Full record

ArticleeLife2021

Inequalities in the distribution of National Institutes of Health research project grant funding.

Michael S Lauer, Deepshikha Roychowdhury

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Prestige at Play: University Hierarchies and the Reproduction of Funding Inequalities.Canadian review of sociology = Revue canadienne de sociologie · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Productivity of National Cancer Institute K Awardees and Their Transition to Independent Funding.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Understanding Health Equity in Patient-Reported Outcomes.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Promoting a MOSAIC future in science.Trends in biochemical sciences · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Elements of successful NIH grant applications.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael S LauerNational Institutes of Health, Office of the Director, Bethesda, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9217-8177
Deepshikha RoychowdhuryNIH Office of Extramural Research, Bethesda, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous reports have described worsening inequalities of National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding. We analyzed Research Project Grant data through the end of Fiscal Year 2020, confirming worsening inequalities beginning at the time of the NIH budget doubling (1998-2003), while finding that trends in recent years have reversed for both investigators and institutions, but only to a modest degree. We also find that career-stage trends have stabilized, with equivalent proportions of early-, mid-, and late-career investigators funded from 2017 to 2020. The fraction of women among funded PIs continues to increase, but they are still not at parity. Analyses of funding inequalities show that inequalities for investigators, and to a lesser degree for institutions, have consistently been greater within groups (i.e. within groups by career stage, gender, race, and degree) than between groups.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchFinancing, GovernmentNational Institutes of Health (U.S.)FemaleHumansMaleRacismSexismSocioeconomic FactorsUnited Statescomputational biologygovernmentinequalitynonepolicyresearch fundingsystems biologyworkforce

Identifiers

PMID34477108
PMCPMC8448532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.