ArticleThe neuroradiology journal2022
Outcomes after endovascular embolization for the treatment of nasal and oropharyngeal hemorrhage: safety, efficacy, and rebleeding.
Article in The neuroradiology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endovascular embolization for the treatment of epistaxis: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2023Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntractable nasal and oropharyngeal hemorrhage may be treated with endovascular embolization, but limited data are available. We sought to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and factors associated with rebleeding.
methodsA retrospective analysis of consecutive embolizations for nasal and oropharyngeal hemorrhage over a 10-year period at a single institution was performed. Outcomes included procedural success (defined as cessation of hemorrhage in the immediate postoperative period), rebleeding requiring an additional intervention, and procedural complications.
resultsA total of 47 embolizations on 39 patients were included. The mean age was 60 years (standard deviation 16.1), 23.1% of patients were women, and 21 (53.8%) patients had a previously diagnosed head/neck malignancy. Bleeding sites were the nose in 20 patients and oropharynx in 21 (two patients presented with both nasal and oral bleeding). Immediate procedural success was achieved in 45 (95.7%) embolizations. Rebleeding requiring an additional intervention occurred after 11 (23.4%) embolizations at a median of one day after the procedure. In the multivariate analysis, preoperative hypotension (odds ratio 4.78, 95% confidence interval 1.04-24.61) and the use of coils (odds ratio 6.09, 95% confidence interval 1.24-46.69) were associated with rebleeding requiring repeat intervention. Complications included two watershed strokes that were anticipated due to occlusion of the internal carotid artery.
conclusionsIn our experience endovascular embolization was a safe and effective treatment option for stopping oral and nasal hemorrhage. However, rebleeding was present after 23.4% of treatments and was associated with preoperative hypotension and the use of coils. Further study in a large multi-institutional cohort is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.