ReviewOphthalmology and therapy2021
Biologic Therapies and Small Molecules for the Management of Non-Infectious Scleritis: A Narrative Review.
Review in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Necrotizing scleritis resistant to biologics successfully managed with the JAK inhibitor upadacitinib: a case report.Journal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection · 2026Article
- Article
- SEVERE CIRCULATORY DISTURBANCE IN OPTIC DISK, RETINA, AND CHOROID AFTER SUB-TENON TRIAMCINOLONE ACETONIDE INJECTION FOR POSTERIOR SCLERITIS.Retinal cases & brief reports · 2025Review
- Posterior Scleritis: A Case Report and Literature Review of the Management of the Condition.Cureus · 2024Article
- Surgical induced necrotizing scleritis following intraocular lens replacement.Journal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection · 2023Article
- Tofacitinib in Refractory Scleritis: A Case Series.Mediterranean journal of rheumatology · 2023Article
- Adalimumab plus Conventional Therapy versus Conventional Therapy in Refractory Non-Infectious Scleritis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Plasmapheresis as a viable treatment option for scleritis.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2022Article
- Comparison of Intestinal Microbes in Noninfectious Anterior Scleritis Patients With and Without Rheumatoid Arthritis.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Idiopathic Posterior Scleritis Complicated by Optic Perineuritis and Ocular Motility Disorder Successfully Controlled with Adalimumab: A Case Report.Case reports in ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Scleritis refers to a wide spectrum of ocular conditions ranging from mild to sight-threatening scleral inflammation that may compromise visual function and threaten the anatomical integrity of the ocular globe. Most aggressive forms like necrotizing or posterior scleritis are often difficult-to-treat cases, refractory to conventional treatment. The association with systemic diseases, namely rheumatoid arthritis, Sjögren syndrome, granulomatosis with polyangiitis, and relapsing polychondritis, may have prognostic implications as well. A better understanding of the pathogenesis of ocular inflammatory diseases have paved the way to more effective and targeted treatment approaches. In this regard, a growing body of evidence supports the potential role of biologic agents in the management of non-infectious scleral inflammation, either idiopathic or in a background of immune-mediated systemic disorders. Biologic agents such as anti-tumor necrosis factor agents, interleukin-1 and interleukin-6 inhibitors as well as CD20 blockade have displayed promising results. More specifically, several studies have reported their ability to control scleral inflammation, reduce the overall scleritis relapses, and allow a glucocorticoid-sparing effect while being generally well tolerated. Anecdotal reports have also been described with other biologic agents including abatacept, ustekinumab, daclizumab, and alemtuzumab as well as targeted small molecules such as tofacitinib. Further studies are warranted to fully elucidate the role of biologic agents in non-infectious scleritis and investigate specific areas with the aim to administer treatments in the context of personalized medicine. This review summarizes the available data regarding clinical trials, small pilot studies, and real-life experience of the last two decades reporting the use of biologic agents in the management of non-infectious scleritis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.