ArticleAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2021
An Introduction to Biomedical Computational Fluid Dynamics.
Article in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis of Cerebrovascular Hemodynamic Differences in Adults with Sickle Cell Disease: Comparing Stroke and Non-Stroke Cohorts.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Emerging Techniques and Treatment Outcomes in Pulmonary Arteriovenous Malformations Embolisation: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Modelling maternal cardiovascular adaptation to pregnancy: a scoping review.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Super Learner Algorithm for Carotid Artery Disease Diagnosis: A Machine Learning Approach Leveraging Craniocervical CT Angiography.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2024Article
- Computational Fluid Dynamics in Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is a tool that has been used by engineers for over 50 years to analyse heat transfer and fluid flow phenomena. In recent years, there have been rapid developments in biomedical and health research applications of CFD. It has been used to evaluate drug delivery systems, analyse physiological flows (e.g. laryngeal jet flow), facilitate surgical planning (e.g. management of intracranial aneurysms), and develop medical devices (e.g. vascular stents and valve prostheses). Due to the complexity of these fluid flows, it demands an interdisciplinary approach consisting of engineers, computer scientists, and mathematicians to develop the computer programs and software used to solve the mathematical equations. Advances in technology and decreases in computational cost are allowing CFD to be more widely accessible and therefore used in more varied contexts. Cardiovascular medicine is the most common area of biomedical research in which CFD is currently being used, followed closely by upper and lower respiratory tract medicine. CFD is also being used in research investigating cerebrospinal fluid, synovial joints, and intracellular fluid. Although CFD can provide meaningful and aesthetically pleasing outputs, interpretation of the data can be challenging for those without a strong understanding of mathematical and engineering principles. Future development and evolution of computational medicine will therefore require close collaboration between experts in engineering, computer science, and biomedical research. This chapter aims to introduce computational fluid dynamics and present the reader with the basics of biological fluid properties, the CFD method, and its applications within biomedical research through published examples, in hope of bridging knowledge gaps in this rapidly emerging method of biomedical analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34476751What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.